The unintended consequences of Open Access publishing – And possible futures

[Display omitted] •Most early geography journals were established by learned societies as non-profit-making ventures.•Most of these are now published by commercial organisations, alongside many others they have established.•Journal publication is now a capitalist, profit-making venture to which acad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoforum 2020-06, Vol.112, p.9-12
Hauptverfasser: MacLeavy, Julie, Harris, Richard, Johnston, Ron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Most early geography journals were established by learned societies as non-profit-making ventures.•Most of these are now published by commercial organisations, alongside many others they have established.•Journal publication is now a capitalist, profit-making venture to which academics donate their intellectual property.•Moves to make all journal papers derived from publicly-funded research freely accessible and sustained by author charges will exacerbate this situation.•Non-capitalist alternatives are desirable. Journal publication in geography changed significantly in the late 20th century as its dominance by learned societies was captured by (large, multi-national) commercial organisations making large profits from freely-donated authors’ intellectual property. Further changes are now proposed, involving journals being freely accessible, sustained not by subscriptions but rather by author payments, which will enhance capitalist publishers’ profit-making potential and disadvantage authors. Alternatives are needed, returning to the earlier model whereby research papers are not treated as profit-making commodities.
ISSN:0016-7185
1872-9398
DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.010