Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy
Theoretical research finds that environmental regulation has both positive and negative effects on enterprise productivity. Based on the Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction policy implemented by the Chinese government, this study empirically analyzed the policy treatment level boundary conditio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6742 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 6742 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Lou, Yanfeng Tian, Yezhuang Tang, Xueliang |
description | Theoretical research finds that environmental regulation has both positive and negative effects on enterprise productivity. Based on the Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction policy implemented by the Chinese government, this study empirically analyzed the policy treatment level boundary condition of the positive and negative effects that dominated and its moderating factors. The generalized propensity score matching model (GPSM) was used to analyze the net effect of the policy on the total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The results showed that: (1) the low treatment level of the policy can promote the growth of the enterprises’ TFP; (2) in contrast, the treatment level of the policy exceeded a certain threshold, which gradually led to an inhibitory effect on the enterprises’ TFP; (3) the mechanism used to enforce the policy caused the enterprises to innovate, which enhanced their TFP, but took time to gradually release; (4) the enterprises with a stronger capacity for innovation or a larger size found it easier to transform the pressure from the policy into an innovative impetus to improve their TFP; (5) however, the government subsidies distorted the forced-innovation effect of the policy on the enterprises’ innovation, which restrained the positive effect of the policy on the TFP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12176742 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2436768561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2436768561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-845d1fe6819f8d88e07183957588cc40bceaababbdaead1adcfadb8389f8c1e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN9KwzAYxYMoOOZufIKCd0I1afonvRKpUwcDx9DrkiZfNaNNZtJWdreH8MbX25MYN0G_m3MufpyPcxA6J_iK0hxfu55EJEuzODpCowhnJCQ4wcf__CmaOLfC_iglOUlH6OPOgAumelDW6BZ0x5tgCa99wztldDBr19YMEHDtmQ7s2ioHu-2XCxbWyF50alDd5ma3_ZwOSoIWENTWtEHxpjTfcwW3lQ9awp72bmEaJTZn6KTmjYPJr47Ry_30uXgM508Ps-J2HoooT7qQxYkkNaSM5DWTjIFvwmieZAljQsS4EsB5xatKcuCScClqLitGmccFAUzH6OKQ63u89-C6cmV6q_3LMoppmqUsSYmnLg-UsMY5C3Xpi7bcbkqCy59ty79t6TdxZnG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436768561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lou, Yanfeng ; Tian, Yezhuang ; Tang, Xueliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yanfeng ; Tian, Yezhuang ; Tang, Xueliang</creatorcontrib><description>Theoretical research finds that environmental regulation has both positive and negative effects on enterprise productivity. Based on the Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction policy implemented by the Chinese government, this study empirically analyzed the policy treatment level boundary condition of the positive and negative effects that dominated and its moderating factors. The generalized propensity score matching model (GPSM) was used to analyze the net effect of the policy on the total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The results showed that: (1) the low treatment level of the policy can promote the growth of the enterprises’ TFP; (2) in contrast, the treatment level of the policy exceeded a certain threshold, which gradually led to an inhibitory effect on the enterprises’ TFP; (3) the mechanism used to enforce the policy caused the enterprises to innovate, which enhanced their TFP, but took time to gradually release; (4) the enterprises with a stronger capacity for innovation or a larger size found it easier to transform the pressure from the policy into an innovative impetus to improve their TFP; (5) however, the government subsidies distorted the forced-innovation effect of the policy on the enterprises’ innovation, which restrained the positive effect of the policy on the TFP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12176742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Boundary conditions ; Carbon dioxide ; Coal ; Councils ; Economic development ; Emissions ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Environmental policy ; Environmental regulations ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Manufacturing industry ; Model matching ; Outdoor air quality ; Productivity ; Regulation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6742</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-845d1fe6819f8d88e07183957588cc40bceaababbdaead1adcfadb8389f8c1e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-845d1fe6819f8d88e07183957588cc40bceaababbdaead1adcfadb8389f8c1e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yanfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Yezhuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xueliang</creatorcontrib><title>Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Theoretical research finds that environmental regulation has both positive and negative effects on enterprise productivity. Based on the Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction policy implemented by the Chinese government, this study empirically analyzed the policy treatment level boundary condition of the positive and negative effects that dominated and its moderating factors. The generalized propensity score matching model (GPSM) was used to analyze the net effect of the policy on the total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The results showed that: (1) the low treatment level of the policy can promote the growth of the enterprises’ TFP; (2) in contrast, the treatment level of the policy exceeded a certain threshold, which gradually led to an inhibitory effect on the enterprises’ TFP; (3) the mechanism used to enforce the policy caused the enterprises to innovate, which enhanced their TFP, but took time to gradually release; (4) the enterprises with a stronger capacity for innovation or a larger size found it easier to transform the pressure from the policy into an innovative impetus to improve their TFP; (5) however, the government subsidies distorted the forced-innovation effect of the policy on the enterprises’ innovation, which restrained the positive effect of the policy on the TFP.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Model matching</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN9KwzAYxYMoOOZufIKCd0I1afonvRKpUwcDx9DrkiZfNaNNZtJWdreH8MbX25MYN0G_m3MufpyPcxA6J_iK0hxfu55EJEuzODpCowhnJCQ4wcf__CmaOLfC_iglOUlH6OPOgAumelDW6BZ0x5tgCa99wztldDBr19YMEHDtmQ7s2ioHu-2XCxbWyF50alDd5ma3_ZwOSoIWENTWtEHxpjTfcwW3lQ9awp72bmEaJTZn6KTmjYPJr47Ry_30uXgM508Ps-J2HoooT7qQxYkkNaSM5DWTjIFvwmieZAljQsS4EsB5xatKcuCScClqLitGmccFAUzH6OKQ63u89-C6cmV6q_3LMoppmqUsSYmnLg-UsMY5C3Xpi7bcbkqCy59ty79t6TdxZnG0</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Lou, Yanfeng</creator><creator>Tian, Yezhuang</creator><creator>Tang, Xueliang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy</title><author>Lou, Yanfeng ; Tian, Yezhuang ; Tang, Xueliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-845d1fe6819f8d88e07183957588cc40bceaababbdaead1adcfadb8389f8c1e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Model matching</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yanfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Yezhuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xueliang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lou, Yanfeng</au><au>Tian, Yezhuang</au><au>Tang, Xueliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>6742</spage><pages>6742-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Theoretical research finds that environmental regulation has both positive and negative effects on enterprise productivity. Based on the Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction policy implemented by the Chinese government, this study empirically analyzed the policy treatment level boundary condition of the positive and negative effects that dominated and its moderating factors. The generalized propensity score matching model (GPSM) was used to analyze the net effect of the policy on the total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The results showed that: (1) the low treatment level of the policy can promote the growth of the enterprises’ TFP; (2) in contrast, the treatment level of the policy exceeded a certain threshold, which gradually led to an inhibitory effect on the enterprises’ TFP; (3) the mechanism used to enforce the policy caused the enterprises to innovate, which enhanced their TFP, but took time to gradually release; (4) the enterprises with a stronger capacity for innovation or a larger size found it easier to transform the pressure from the policy into an innovative impetus to improve their TFP; (5) however, the government subsidies distorted the forced-innovation effect of the policy on the enterprises’ innovation, which restrained the positive effect of the policy on the TFP.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12176742</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6742 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2436768561 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Air pollution Boundary conditions Carbon dioxide Coal Councils Economic development Emissions Energy conservation Energy consumption Environmental policy Environmental regulations GDP Gross Domestic Product Hypotheses Innovations Manufacturing industry Model matching Outdoor air quality Productivity Regulation |
title | Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Environmental%20Regulation%20Improve%20an%20Enterprise%E2%80%99s%20Productivity?%E2%80%94Evidence%20from%20China%E2%80%99s%20Carbon%20Reduction%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Lou,%20Yanfeng&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=6742&rft.pages=6742-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12176742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2436768561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436768561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |