The Return of the Bricoleur? Emplotment, Intentionality, and Tradition in Paleolithic Art
In this paper, we want to re-visit some of the core assumptions about the making of the images we call Paleolithic art. We propose that not all images were made as derived from a long standing and formal system of image-making guidelines, and that many can be more likely accounted for as a part of b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of archaeological method and theory 2020-09, Vol.27 (3), p.511-525 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, we want to re-visit some of the core assumptions about the making of the images we call Paleolithic art. We propose that not all images were made as derived from a long standing and formal system of image-making guidelines, and that many can be more likely accounted for as a part of bricolage processes.As well, our current emplotment of the "story" of Paleolithic art depends too much on the concept that it was a long-standing tradition, rather than thinking that perhaps the apparent similarities are the result of contiguous rather than continuous practices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1072-5369 1573-7764 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10816-020-09466-7 |