The Return of the Bricoleur? Emplotment, Intentionality, and Tradition in Paleolithic Art

In this paper, we want to re-visit some of the core assumptions about the making of the images we call Paleolithic art. We propose that not all images were made as derived from a long standing and formal system of image-making guidelines, and that many can be more likely accounted for as a part of b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of archaeological method and theory 2020-09, Vol.27 (3), p.511-525
Hauptverfasser: Conkey, Margaret W., Fisher, Roy A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, we want to re-visit some of the core assumptions about the making of the images we call Paleolithic art. We propose that not all images were made as derived from a long standing and formal system of image-making guidelines, and that many can be more likely accounted for as a part of bricolage processes.As well, our current emplotment of the "story" of Paleolithic art depends too much on the concept that it was a long-standing tradition, rather than thinking that perhaps the apparent similarities are the result of contiguous rather than continuous practices.
ISSN:1072-5369
1573-7764
DOI:10.1007/s10816-020-09466-7