Recommendations for singlet-based approach in ligand binding assays: an IQ Consortium perspective

Historically, ligand-binding assays for pharmacokinetic samples employed duplicate rather than singlet-based analysis. Herein, the Translational and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) Sciences Leadership Group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioanalysis 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.823-834
Hauptverfasser: Pillutla, Renuka, Gorovits, Boris, Gleason, Carol, Quiroz, Jorge, Christopher, David, Braun, Manuela, Brockus, Catherine, Donaldson, Douglas, Haslberger, Tobias, He, Ling, Qian, Mark, Sydor, Jens, Wickremsinhe, Enaksha, Williams, Lakenya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Historically, ligand-binding assays for pharmacokinetic samples employed duplicate rather than singlet-based analysis. Herein, the Translational and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) Sciences Leadership Group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) presents a study aiming to determine the value of duplicate versus singlet-based testing. Based on analysis of data collected from eight organizations for 20 drug candidates representing seven molecular types and four analytical platforms, statistical comparisons of validation and in-study quality controls and study unknown samples demonstrated good agreement across duplicate sets. Simulation models were also used to assess the impact of sample duplicate characteristics on bioequivalence outcomes. Results show that testing in singlet is acceptable for assays with %CV ≤15% between duplicates. Singlet-based approach is proposed as the default for ligand-binding assays while a duplicate-based approach is needed where imprecision and/or inaccuracy impede the validation of the assay.
ISSN:1757-6180
1757-6199
DOI:10.4155/bio-2020-0094