Unemployment Forecasts: Room for Improvement?
During the crisis of 2009–2013 many institutes made large errors in their unemployment forecasts. This paper develops alternative short-run models to improve these forecasts. The models are applied to the Netherlands and compared to the unemployment forecasts of the CPB. A BVAR model performs signif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | De Economist (Netherlands) 2020-09, Vol.168 (3), p.403-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | During the crisis of 2009–2013 many institutes made large errors in their unemployment forecasts. This paper develops alternative short-run models to improve these forecasts. The models are applied to the Netherlands and compared to the unemployment forecasts of the CPB. A BVAR model performs significantly better than the CPB forecasts. The BVAR can also be used to predict the labor market transition probabilities used in the forecast functions of two-state and three-state stock-flow models of unemployment. This also results in significantly better forecasts. However the combination of these three best-performing models produces the largest gain in forecast accuracy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-063X 1572-9982 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10645-020-09363-0 |