Unemployment Forecasts: Room for Improvement?

During the crisis of 2009–2013 many institutes made large errors in their unemployment forecasts. This paper develops alternative short-run models to improve these forecasts. The models are applied to the Netherlands and compared to the unemployment forecasts of the CPB. A BVAR model performs signif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:De Economist (Netherlands) 2020-09, Vol.168 (3), p.403-417
Hauptverfasser: Adema, Yvonne, Folmer, Kees, van Heuvelen, Gerrit Hugo, Kuijpers, Sonny, Luginbuhl, Rob, Scheer, Bas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During the crisis of 2009–2013 many institutes made large errors in their unemployment forecasts. This paper develops alternative short-run models to improve these forecasts. The models are applied to the Netherlands and compared to the unemployment forecasts of the CPB. A BVAR model performs significantly better than the CPB forecasts. The BVAR can also be used to predict the labor market transition probabilities used in the forecast functions of two-state and three-state stock-flow models of unemployment. This also results in significantly better forecasts. However the combination of these three best-performing models produces the largest gain in forecast accuracy.
ISSN:0013-063X
1572-9982
DOI:10.1007/s10645-020-09363-0