The Construction of a Virtual Backbone with a Bounded Diameter in a Wireless Network

We usually use a digraph to represent a wireless network (WN). Correspondingly, a connected dominating set (CDS) of the digraph is usually used to denote a virtual backbone (VB) of the corresponding WN. In this article, focusing on the problem of a minimum strongly connected dominating and absorbing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wireless communications and mobile computing 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-14
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Xinyu, Li, Yanyan, Yi, Meng, Liang, Jiarong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We usually use a digraph to represent a wireless network (WN). Correspondingly, a connected dominating set (CDS) of the digraph is usually used to denote a virtual backbone (VB) of the corresponding WN. In this article, focusing on the problem of a minimum strongly connected dominating and absorbing set (MSCDAS) with a bounded diameter (or guaranteed routing cost) for a digraph, which is strongly connected, we introduce two algorithms. One is called the guaranteed routing cost strongly connected dominating and absorbing set (GOC-SCDAS), which can generate a strongly connected dominating and absorbing set (SCDAS) with a performance ratio 14.4k+1/22 in respect of the optimal solution. Another is called the α guaranteed routing cost strongly connected bidirectional dominating and absorbing set (α-GOC-SCBDAS), which can generate a strongly connected bidirectional dominating and absorbing set (SCBDAS) with a performance ratio 8.8443k+1/22k+1/22 in respect of the optimal solution and a better routing cost, where k=rmax/rmin and rmin,rmax is the transmission range of nodes in the network. Through the simulation experiments, we obtain the conclusion that in terms of the diameter and average routing path length (ARPL) of CDS, the outputs of our algorithms are better than those of the algorithm in (Du et al. 2006).
ISSN:1530-8669
1530-8677
DOI:10.1155/2020/5602325