884-P: Discrepancies in Key Metrics of Glycemic Control between Retrospective Continuous Glucose Monitoring System and Flash Glucose Monitoring in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

Limited data on head-to-head comparisons between the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system (FreeStyle Libre®, FSL) and retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (IproTM2) were available. The study aimed to compare glycemic metrics derived from two devices in adult patients with type 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: ZHOU, YONGWEN, DENG, HONGRONG, YANG, DAIZHI, YAN, JINHUA, XU, WEN, LIU, HONGXIA, GAN, LU, LUO, SIHUI, ZHENG, XUEYING, LIANG, HUA, YAO, BIN, WENG, JIANPING
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Limited data on head-to-head comparisons between the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system (FreeStyle Libre®, FSL) and retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (IproTM2) were available. The study aimed to compare glycemic metrics derived from two devices in adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adult T1D patients with HbA1c of 7 to 10% were recruited and randomized to adopt FSL or self-monitoring blood glucose in the 24-week trial (NCT03522870). In the FSL group, glucose was simultaneously measured by FSL and IproTM2s on patients’ different arms for 14 days at 12 and 24 weeks. Data collected on the day of insertion and detachment and those of insufficient quality (
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db20-884-P