364-OR: Igls Classification for Islet Autotransplantation

Background: The Igls criteria for assessing islet function after allotransplantation cannot be directly applied to islet autotransplantation (IAT) patients due to differences in baseline characteristics of IAT patients (insulin independent and C-peptide positive). Methods: We tested modified criteri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: MCEACHRON, KENDALL R., YANG, YI, PRUETT, TIMOTHY L., BELLIN, MELENA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The Igls criteria for assessing islet function after allotransplantation cannot be directly applied to islet autotransplantation (IAT) patients due to differences in baseline characteristics of IAT patients (insulin independent and C-peptide positive). Methods: We tested modified criteria (Auto-Igls) for assessing islet function in a large cohort of total pancreatectomy-IAT (TPIAT) patients from 2010-2018 (n=379). Metabolic outcomes post-IAT were assessed (Table 1). We assigned an Auto-Igls class to each patient as able, and evaluated the utility, validity, and perioperative predictors of Auto-Igls at 1 year post-IAT. We associated Auto-Igls with independent measures of islet graft function where available: continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data or acute c-peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) from intravenous glucose tolerance tests. Results: Auto-Igls class was assigned to 264 patients (69%). Of the 115 patients who could not be classified, most (74%) were missing exact insulin u/kg/day. The only significant predictor of Auto-Igls class was the islet mass transplanted (p
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db20-364-OR