364-OR: Igls Classification for Islet Autotransplantation
Background: The Igls criteria for assessing islet function after allotransplantation cannot be directly applied to islet autotransplantation (IAT) patients due to differences in baseline characteristics of IAT patients (insulin independent and C-peptide positive). Methods: We tested modified criteri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: The Igls criteria for assessing islet function after allotransplantation cannot be directly applied to islet autotransplantation (IAT) patients due to differences in baseline characteristics of IAT patients (insulin independent and C-peptide positive).
Methods: We tested modified criteria (Auto-Igls) for assessing islet function in a large cohort of total pancreatectomy-IAT (TPIAT) patients from 2010-2018 (n=379). Metabolic outcomes post-IAT were assessed (Table 1). We assigned an Auto-Igls class to each patient as able, and evaluated the utility, validity, and perioperative predictors of Auto-Igls at 1 year post-IAT. We associated Auto-Igls with independent measures of islet graft function where available: continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data or acute c-peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) from intravenous glucose tolerance tests.
Results: Auto-Igls class was assigned to 264 patients (69%). Of the 115 patients who could not be classified, most (74%) were missing exact insulin u/kg/day. The only significant predictor of Auto-Igls class was the islet mass transplanted (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/db20-364-OR |