1163-P: Cost Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide 14mg vs. Empagliflozin 25mg in Canada

Background: A1C lowering was significantly greater for oral semaglutide 14 mg than empagliflozin 25 mg for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on metformin in the 52-week, randomized, open-label PIONEER 2 trial (NCT02863328). We estimated the cost effectiveness of oral semaglutide vs. empagliflozin in Canada from the payer and societal perspectives. Methods: Modeling methods were used to extrapolate benefits observed in PIONEER 2 to long-term costs and outcomes, including quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), for patients treated with oral semaglutide or empagliflozin. As with analysis in other settings, the IHE-Diabetes Cohort Model (IHE-DCM) was used. The analysis was also run using the Economic and Health Outcomes microsimulation model (ECHO-T2DM). Patient baseline characteristics and treatment effects were sourced from PIONEER 2. In the model simulations, both agents were assumed discontinued and insulin initiated when A1C was >8.0%. Unit costs (CAD$) and utilities were sourced from the literature. Results: Oral semaglutide was associated with more QALYs than empagliflozin over 40 years (0.39 with IHE-DCM and 0.34 with ECHO-T2DM). The gains came with increased costs (CAD$8,202 with IHE-DCM and CAD$9,255 with ECHO-T2DM), yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of CAD$21,115 and CAD$27,496/QALY gained, respectively, below the often-cited willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD$50,000/QALY. When productivity costs and the full societal perspective are considered, the ICERs were CAD$18,239 and CAD$19,112, respectively. Sensitivity analyses that included cost, treatment effect, time horizon and biomarker rebound assumptions generally confirmed the results. Conclusion: Two models independently found oral semaglutide to be cost-effective compared to empagliflozin over 40 years for the treatment of patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin in Canada. While uncommon, the use of two models can reduce decision-making uncertainty.