Analysis of the differences in the results of the year 2019 between the world best juniors and seniors in men's artistic gymnasts

The subject sample was composed of N=293 gymnasts who competed at the 49th FIG Men's Senior Artistic Gymnastics World Championships (Stuttgart, GER) and N=134 gymnasts who competed at the 1st FIG Men's Junior Artistic Gymnastics World Championships ( Gyor, HUN). This study aimed to determi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Physical Education and Sport 2020-05, Vol.20 (3), p.1265-1271
Hauptverfasser: Atiković, Almir, Mujanović, Amra Nožinoić, Petković, Emilija, Delaš Kalinski, Sunčica, Kremnický, Juraj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The subject sample was composed of N=293 gymnasts who competed at the 49th FIG Men's Senior Artistic Gymnastics World Championships (Stuttgart, GER) and N=134 gymnasts who competed at the 1st FIG Men's Junior Artistic Gymnastics World Championships ( Gyor, HUN). This study aimed to determine the differences between the two age groups of gymnasts (juniors and seniors) in all the predictor variables by analyzing the Ddifficulty score, E-execution score and FS-final score from 6 apparatus: Floor Exercise (FX), Pommel Horse (PH), Rings (RI), Vault (VT), Parallel Bars (PB), High Bar ( HB). The E jury score is no different during the competition. Average D and FS scores on the vault are significantly higher than on all other apparatus. The study established significant differences between the samples in almost all the analyzed scores. The results of the independent t-test were significant, indicating there a significant difference between juniors and seniors is 7.4 years of age. We can conclude that juniors and seniors differ significantly in D scores, and the FS final scores without making a big difference in the performance technique of the composition in the E scores: Q = qualification (C-I), AAF = all-around finals (C-II), TF = team finals (C-III) and AF = apparatus finals. Based on what was presented in the work, the importance of the permanent identification of how to reach the maximum potential of how to determine team competition strategy, should we strive for the balanced development of all disciplines, do you intensify one or a combination of discipline groups, which disciplines have the most positive transfer to other disciplines, what disciplines are most contributing to success?
ISSN:2247-8051
2247-806X
DOI:10.7752/jpes.2020.03176