Role of voice rest following laser resection of vocal fold lesions: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives/Hypothesis Voice rest is often prescribed following phonosurgery by most surgeons despite limited empiric evidence to support its practice. This study assessed the effect of postphonosurgery voice rest on vocal outcomes. Study Design Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2020-07, Vol.130 (7), p.1750-1755
Hauptverfasser: Dhaliwal, Sandeep S., Doyle, Philip C., Failla, Sebastiano, Hawkins, Sarah, Fung, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis Voice rest is often prescribed following phonosurgery by most surgeons despite limited empiric evidence to support its practice. This study assessed the effect of postphonosurgery voice rest on vocal outcomes. Study Design Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with unilateral vocal fold lesions undergoing CO2 laser excision were recruited in a prospective manner and randomized into one of two groups: 1) an experimental arm consisting of 7 days of absolute voice rest, or 2) a control arm consisting of no voice rest. The primary outcome measure was the Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included aerodynamic measurements (maximum phonation time), acoustic measures (fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and harmonic‐to‐noise ratio), and auditory‐perceptual measures. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed preoperatively and reassessed postoperatively at the 1‐ and 3‐month follow‐up. Patient compliance to voice rest instructions were controlled for using subjective and objective parameters. Results Thirty patients were enrolled with 15 randomized to each arm of the study. Statistical analysis for the entire cohort showed a significant improvement in the mean preoperative VHI‐10 compared to postoperative assessments at 1‐month (19.0 vs. 7.3, P
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.28287