Cross-Component Prediction in HEVC

Video coding in the YCbCr color space has been widely used, since it is efficient for compression, but it can result in color distortion due to conversion error. Meanwhile, coding in the RGB color space maintains high color fidelity, having the drawback of a substantial bitrate increase with respect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 2020-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1699-1708
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Woo-Shik, Pu, Wei, Khairat, Ali, Siekmann, Mischa, Sole, Joel, Chen, Jianle, Karczewicz, Marta, Nguyen, Tung, Marpe, Detlev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Video coding in the YCbCr color space has been widely used, since it is efficient for compression, but it can result in color distortion due to conversion error. Meanwhile, coding in the RGB color space maintains high color fidelity, having the drawback of a substantial bitrate increase with respect to YCbCr coding. Cross-component prediction (CCP) efficiently compresses video content by decorrelating color components while keeping high color fidelity. In this scheme, the chroma residual signal is predicted from the luma residual signal inside the coding loop. This paper gives a description of the CCP scheme from several points of view, from theoretical background to practical implementation. The proposed CCP scheme has been evaluated in standardization communities and adopted into H.265/High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Range Extensions. The experimental results show significant coding performance improvements for both natural and screen content video, while the quality of all color components is maintained. The average coding gains for natural video are 17% and 5% bitrate reduction in the case of intra coding and 11% and 4% in the case of inter coding for RGB and YCbCr coding, respectively, while the average increment of encoding and decoding times in the HEVC reference software implementation are 10% and 4%, respectively.
ISSN:1051-8215
1558-2205
DOI:10.1109/TCSVT.2015.2496821