Locating the pseudogap closing point in cuprate superconductors: Absence of entrant or reentrant behavior
Many current descriptions of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates envision a doping-dependent transition line T*(p) which descends monotonically toward zero just beyond optimal doping. There is much debate as to the location of the terminal point p* where T*(p) vanishes, whether or not there is a ph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. B 2020-05, Vol.101 (17), p.1, Article 174512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many current descriptions of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates envision a doping-dependent transition line T*(p) which descends monotonically toward zero just beyond optimal doping. There is much debate as to the location of the terminal point p* where T*(p) vanishes, whether or not there is a phase transition at T* and exactly how T*(p) behaves below Tc within the superconducting dome. One perspective sees T*(p) cutting the dome and continuing to descend monotonically to zero at p*≈0.19 holes/Cu-referred to here as entrant behavior. Another perspective derived from photoemission studies is that T*(p) intersects the dome near p≈0.23 holes/Cu then turns back below Tc, falling to zero again around p*≈0.19-referred to here as reentrant behavior. By examining field-dependent thermodynamic data for Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ we show that neither entrant nor reentrant behavior is supported. Rather, p* sharply delimits the pseudogap regime: For p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2469-9950 2469-9969 |
DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.174512 |