Evaluation of OCO‐2 XCO2 Variability at Local and Synoptic Scales using Lidar and In Situ Observations from the ACT‐America Campaigns

With nearly 1 million observations of column‐mean carbon dioxide concentration (XCO2) per day, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO‐2) presents exciting possibilities for monitoring the global carbon cycle, including the detection of subcontinental column CO2 variations. While the OCO‐2 data set h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2020-05, Vol.125 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Bell, Emily, O'Dell, Christopher W, Davis, Kenneth J, Campbell, Joel, Browell, Edward, Denning, A Scott, Dobler, Jeremy, Erxleben, Wayne, Tai‐Fang Fan, Kooi, Susan, Lin, Bing, Pal, Sandip, Weir, Brad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With nearly 1 million observations of column‐mean carbon dioxide concentration (XCO2) per day, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO‐2) presents exciting possibilities for monitoring the global carbon cycle, including the detection of subcontinental column CO2 variations. While the OCO‐2 data set has been shown to achieve target precision and accuracy on a single‐sounding level, the validation of XCO2 spatial gradients on subcontinental scales remains challenging. In this work, we investigate the use of an integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) lidar for evaluation of OCO‐2 observations via NASA's Atmospheric Carbon and Transport (ACT)‐America project. The project has completed eight clear‐sky underflights of OCO‐2 with the Multifunctional Fiber Laser Lidar (MFLL)—along with a suite of in situ instruments—giving a precisely colocated, high‐resolution validation data set spanning nearly 3,800 km across four seasons. We explore the challenges and opportunities involved in comparing the MFLL and OCO‐2 XCO2 data sets and evaluate their agreement on synoptic and local scales. We find that OCO‐2 synoptic‐scale gradients generally agree with those derived from the lidar, typically to ±0.1 ppm per degree latitude for gradients ranging in strength from 0 to 1 ppm per degree latitude. CO2 reanalysis products also typically agree to ±0.25 ppm per degree when compared with an in situ‐informed CO2 “curtain.” Real XCO2 features at local scales, however, remain challenging to observe and validate from space, with correlation coefficients typically below 0.35 between OCO‐2 and the MFLL. Even so, ACT‐America data have helped investigate interesting local XCO2 patterns and identify systematic spurious cloud‐related features in the OCO‐2 data set.
ISSN:2169-897X
2169-8996
DOI:10.1029/2019JD031400