Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region
A cognitive model of optimal control of an ecological–socioeconomic system water body–watershed for the case of the White Sea (Beloe more) and its watershed (Belomor’e) is presented. The model includes parameters characterizing the climate, water and terrestrial systems of the sea and its watershed,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources 2020-05, Vol.47 (3), p.506-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 515 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Water resources |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Menshutkin, V. V. Filatov, N. N. |
description | A cognitive model of optimal control of an ecological–socioeconomic system water body–watershed for the case of the White Sea (Beloe more) and its watershed (Belomor’e) is presented. The model includes parameters characterizing the climate, water and terrestrial systems of the sea and its watershed, the economics, fishery, agriculture, mineral resources, and the population. Cognitive modeling is used to study only qualitative changes taking place in the system at different complexes of conditions. The criterion of optimization is the level of living of the population. The scenario considered include various climate conditions, investments in production assets, industrial and domestic waste treatment, and the development of agriculture and fishery. The cognitive model was used to carry out 10 experiments with different scenarios. For each scenario, operation regimes were chosen to ensure the highest population living standard. The highest living standard will be ensured at the scenario that includes favorable climate conditions (warming above the climate norm for 1960–1990), sufficient mineral resources, and investments. The maximal level of agricultural development can cause damage to the environment. The cognitive model as a means for strategic planning has been developed at a qualitative level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0097807820030100 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2405904676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2405904676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c73af2698b48327be662fffe2677c4d5e44020f48126b8c9fd22ae734b10b9183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGjus47KDiTyqqREFlFyXOuE2VxsV2F5FYcAduyElIKYgFYjWaed97Iz1CjhmcMhaLswlAmihIFAeIgQHskB6ToKJYiOdd0tvI0UbfJwfeL2CDqLRHXu9tiXXVzOh4FaplXtOhbYKzNbWGhjnSK21rO6t0Xn-8vU-srixq29hlpemk9QGXdJoHdPTSlm1HfC1-juU5HeYe6SSsy_YnazqvQnfCnD7grLLNIdkzee3x6Hv2ydP11ePwNhqNb-6GF6NIx0yGSCdxbrhMVSFUzJMCpeTGGOQySbQoBygEcDBCMS4LpVNTcp5jEouCQZEyFffJyTZ35ezLGn3IFnbtmu5lxgUMUhAykR3FtpR21nuHJlu5rhHXZgyyTcnZn5I7D996fMc2M3S_yf-bPgFof4AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405904676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Menshutkin, V. V. ; Filatov, N. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Menshutkin, V. V. ; Filatov, N. N.</creatorcontrib><description>A cognitive model of optimal control of an ecological–socioeconomic system water body–watershed for the case of the White Sea (Beloe more) and its watershed (Belomor’e) is presented. The model includes parameters characterizing the climate, water and terrestrial systems of the sea and its watershed, the economics, fishery, agriculture, mineral resources, and the population. Cognitive modeling is used to study only qualitative changes taking place in the system at different complexes of conditions. The criterion of optimization is the level of living of the population. The scenario considered include various climate conditions, investments in production assets, industrial and domestic waste treatment, and the development of agriculture and fishery. The cognitive model was used to carry out 10 experiments with different scenarios. For each scenario, operation regimes were chosen to ensure the highest population living standard. The highest living standard will be ensured at the scenario that includes favorable climate conditions (warming above the climate norm for 1960–1990), sufficient mineral resources, and investments. The maximal level of agricultural development can cause damage to the environment. The cognitive model as a means for strategic planning has been developed at a qualitative level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-8078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-344X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0097807820030100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural wastes ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Aquatic Pollution ; Climate ; Climate models ; Climatic conditions ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive models ; Control systems ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Economic models ; Economics ; Fisheries ; Global warming ; Household wastes ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Industrial wastes ; Investment ; Investments ; Mineral resources ; Modelling ; Optimal control ; Optimization ; Socioeconomics ; Waste treatment ; Waste Water Technology ; Water bodies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water resources, 2020-05, Vol.47 (3), p.506-515</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c73af2698b48327be662fffe2677c4d5e44020f48126b8c9fd22ae734b10b9183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c73af2698b48327be662fffe2677c4d5e44020f48126b8c9fd22ae734b10b9183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0097807820030100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0097807820030100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Menshutkin, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filatov, N. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region</title><title>Water resources</title><addtitle>Water Resour</addtitle><description>A cognitive model of optimal control of an ecological–socioeconomic system water body–watershed for the case of the White Sea (Beloe more) and its watershed (Belomor’e) is presented. The model includes parameters characterizing the climate, water and terrestrial systems of the sea and its watershed, the economics, fishery, agriculture, mineral resources, and the population. Cognitive modeling is used to study only qualitative changes taking place in the system at different complexes of conditions. The criterion of optimization is the level of living of the population. The scenario considered include various climate conditions, investments in production assets, industrial and domestic waste treatment, and the development of agriculture and fishery. The cognitive model was used to carry out 10 experiments with different scenarios. For each scenario, operation regimes were chosen to ensure the highest population living standard. The highest living standard will be ensured at the scenario that includes favorable climate conditions (warming above the climate norm for 1960–1990), sufficient mineral resources, and investments. The maximal level of agricultural development can cause damage to the environment. The cognitive model as a means for strategic planning has been developed at a qualitative level.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Household wastes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Mineral resources</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Waste treatment</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water bodies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0097-8078</issn><issn>1608-344X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGjus47KDiTyqqREFlFyXOuE2VxsV2F5FYcAduyElIKYgFYjWaed97Iz1CjhmcMhaLswlAmihIFAeIgQHskB6ToKJYiOdd0tvI0UbfJwfeL2CDqLRHXu9tiXXVzOh4FaplXtOhbYKzNbWGhjnSK21rO6t0Xn-8vU-srixq29hlpemk9QGXdJoHdPTSlm1HfC1-juU5HeYe6SSsy_YnazqvQnfCnD7grLLNIdkzee3x6Hv2ydP11ePwNhqNb-6GF6NIx0yGSCdxbrhMVSFUzJMCpeTGGOQySbQoBygEcDBCMS4LpVNTcp5jEouCQZEyFffJyTZ35ezLGn3IFnbtmu5lxgUMUhAykR3FtpR21nuHJlu5rhHXZgyyTcnZn5I7D996fMc2M3S_yf-bPgFof4AQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Menshutkin, V. V.</creator><creator>Filatov, N. N.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region</title><author>Menshutkin, V. V. ; Filatov, N. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c73af2698b48327be662fffe2677c4d5e44020f48126b8c9fd22ae734b10b9183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Household wastes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Mineral resources</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Waste treatment</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water bodies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Menshutkin, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filatov, N. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Menshutkin, V. V.</au><au>Filatov, N. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region</atitle><jtitle>Water resources</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour</stitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>506-515</pages><issn>0097-8078</issn><eissn>1608-344X</eissn><abstract>A cognitive model of optimal control of an ecological–socioeconomic system water body–watershed for the case of the White Sea (Beloe more) and its watershed (Belomor’e) is presented. The model includes parameters characterizing the climate, water and terrestrial systems of the sea and its watershed, the economics, fishery, agriculture, mineral resources, and the population. Cognitive modeling is used to study only qualitative changes taking place in the system at different complexes of conditions. The criterion of optimization is the level of living of the population. The scenario considered include various climate conditions, investments in production assets, industrial and domestic waste treatment, and the development of agriculture and fishery. The cognitive model was used to carry out 10 experiments with different scenarios. For each scenario, operation regimes were chosen to ensure the highest population living standard. The highest living standard will be ensured at the scenario that includes favorable climate conditions (warming above the climate norm for 1960–1990), sufficient mineral resources, and investments. The maximal level of agricultural development can cause damage to the environment. The cognitive model as a means for strategic planning has been developed at a qualitative level.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0097807820030100</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0097-8078 |
ispartof | Water resources, 2020-05, Vol.47 (3), p.506-515 |
issn | 0097-8078 1608-344X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2405904676 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural development Agricultural wastes Agriculture Agronomy Aquatic Pollution Climate Climate models Climatic conditions Cognitive ability Cognitive models Control systems Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Economic models Economics Fisheries Global warming Household wastes Hydrogeology Hydrology/Water Resources Industrial wastes Investment Investments Mineral resources Modelling Optimal control Optimization Socioeconomics Waste treatment Waste Water Technology Water bodies Water Management Water Pollution Control Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects Watersheds |
title | Modeling Optimal Control of the Ecological–Socioeconomic System Water Body–Watershed: Case Study of the White Sea Region |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20Optimal%20Control%20of%20the%20Ecological%E2%80%93Socioeconomic%20System%20Water%20Body%E2%80%93Watershed:%20Case%20Study%20of%20the%20White%20Sea%20Region&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources&rft.au=Menshutkin,%20V.%20V.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=506-515&rft.issn=0097-8078&rft.eissn=1608-344X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0097807820030100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2405904676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405904676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |