A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Covid-19
To the Editor: After a review of the findings of Cao et al. (published in the Journal online on March 18), 1 many clinicians are abandoning the use of lopinavir–ritonavir for the treatment of Covid-19. We consider this action to be premature. It is crucial to realize that although this trial did not...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2020-05, Vol.382 (21), p.e68-1799 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
After a review of the findings of Cao et al. (published in the
Journal
online on March 18),
1
many clinicians are abandoning the use of lopinavir–ritonavir for the treatment of Covid-19. We consider this action to be premature. It is crucial to realize that although this trial did not show that the time until clinical improvement was meaningfully better than standard care among patients with severe Covid-19 who received lopinavir–ritonavir, the trial was statistically underpowered to show this outcome. In addition, the analyses of secondary outcomes (which still require confirmation) suggested that lopinavir–ritonavir may be associated with . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc2008043 |