On Baroclinic Instability over Continental Shelves: Testing the Utility of Eady-Type Models

This study examines the utility of Eady-type theories as applied to understanding baroclinic instability in coastal flows where depth variations and bottom drag are important. The focus is on the effects of nongeostrophy, boundary dissipation, and bottom slope. The approach compares theoretically derived instability properties against numerical model calculations, for experiments designed to isolate the individual effects and justified to have Eady-like basic states. For the nongeostrophic effect, the theory of Stone (1966) is shown to give reasonable predictions for the most unstable growth rate and wavelength. It is also shown that the growing instability in a fully nonlinear model can be interpreted as boundary-trapped Rossby wave interactions—that is, wave phase locking and westward phase tilt allow waves to be mutually amplified. The analyses demonstrate that both the boundary dissipative and bottom slope effects can be represented by vertical velocities at the lower boundary of the unstable interior, via inducing Ekman pumping and slope-parallel flow, respectively, as proposed by the theories of Williams and Robinson (1974; referred to as the Eady–Ekman problem) and Blumsack and Gierasch (1972). The vertical velocities, characterized by a friction parameter and a slope ratio, modify the bottom wave and thus the scale selection. However, the theories have inherent quantitative limitations. Eady–Ekman neglects boundary layer responses that limit the increase of bottom stress, thereby overestimating the Ekman pumping and growth rate reduction at large drag. Blumsack and Gierasch’s (1972) model ignores slope-induced horizontal shear in the mean flow that tilts the eddies to favor converting energy back to the mean, thus having limited utility over steep slopes.