Role of Capping Material and GaN Polarity on Mg Ion Implantation Activation
Ion implantation of magnesium for p‐type GaN presents many opportunities; however, activation has proven difficult due to the decomposition of GaN at relevant annealing temperatures. Herein, testing the efficacy of multiple in situ and ex situ caps based on aluminum nitride and silicon nitride for G...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physica status solidi. A, Applications and materials science Applications and materials science, 2020-04, Vol.217 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ion implantation of magnesium for p‐type GaN presents many opportunities; however, activation has proven difficult due to the decomposition of GaN at relevant annealing temperatures. Herein, testing the efficacy of multiple in situ and ex situ caps based on aluminum nitride and silicon nitride for GaN protection during annealing is presented. Photoluminescence shows better activation for in situ metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD)‐grown aluminum nitride caps compared with ex situ sputtered aluminum nitride and the best performance by ex situ plasma‐enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) silicon nitride. Furthermore, only samples annealed at the highest temperatures tested show preferential growth of UV luminescence to yellow‐green luminescence reinforcing the need for better capping solutions and higher temperature annealing.
Herein, direct comparison of in situ and ex situ caps including aluminum and silicon nitrides for stabilization of GaN during implanted dopant activation is described. Caps seen here evaluate on macroscopic integrity after annealing, whereas dopant activation and structural quality are also determined. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1862-6300 1862-6319 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pssa.201900789 |