New applications of numerical simulation based on lattice Boltzmann method at high Reynolds numbers

In order to study the flow behavior at high Reynolds numbers, two modified models, known as the multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (MRT-LBM) and large-eddy-simulation lattice Boltzmann method (LES-LBM), have been employed in this paper. The MRT-LBM was designed to improve numerical st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers & mathematics with applications (1987) 2020-03, Vol.79 (6), p.1718-1741
Hauptverfasser: An, Bo, Bergadà, J.M., Mellibovsky, F., Sang, W.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In order to study the flow behavior at high Reynolds numbers, two modified models, known as the multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (MRT-LBM) and large-eddy-simulation lattice Boltzmann method (LES-LBM), have been employed in this paper. The MRT-LBM was designed to improve numerical stability at high Reynolds numbers, by introducing multiple relaxation time terms, which consider the variations of density, energy, momentum, energy flux and viscous stress tensor. As a result, MRT-LBM is capable of dealing with turbulent flows considering energy dispersion and dissipation. In the present paper, this model was employed to simulate the flow at turbulent Reynolds numbers in wall-driven cavities. Two-sided wall driven cavity flow was studied for the first time, based on MRT-LBM, at Reynolds numbers ranging from 2×104to1×106, and employing a very large resolution2048 × 2048. It is found that whenever top and bottom lids are moving in the opposite directions, and the Reynolds number is higher than 2×104, the flow is chaotic, although some quasi-symmetric properties still remain, fully disappearing at Reynolds numbers between 2×105 and 3×105. Furthermore, between this Reynolds numbers range, 2×105
ISSN:0898-1221
1873-7668
DOI:10.1016/j.camwa.2019.10.002