Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature
The Penan Benalui, former hunter-gatherers, started becoming sedentary in the mid-1950s. They have a detailed classification system for wild plants and recognize many useful wild plants, but their use knowledge is relatively simple and differs from that of Bornean farmers. Men are more knowledgeable...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current anthropology 2007-06, Vol.48 (3), p.454-459 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 459 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 454 |
| container_title | Current anthropology |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Koizumi, Miyako Momose, Kuniyasu |
| description | The Penan Benalui, former hunter-gatherers, started becoming sedentary in the mid-1950s. They have a detailed classification system for wild plants and recognize many useful wild plants, but their use knowledge is relatively simple and differs from that of Bornean farmers. Men are more knowledgeable than women about forest plants. Men often hunt in the forest and collect forest products, whereas women spend most of their time in the village. This suggests that ethnobotanical knowledge is closely related to forest activities. At the same time, the Penan Benalui have more than enough knowledge from a utilitarian point of view, and gaining knowledge depends to some extent on personal experience. The nature of the Penan Benalui classification of wild plants does not support previous theories regarding the relationships among use, classification, and nomenclature of organisms. It is possible that nomenclature patterns affect the classification mechanism. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/517593 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_237089230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/517593</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/517593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-52da72b3f794d02e40f21f92f2c9c26527a748ff392180f8f2f106ebb79181e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MtKAzEUBuAgCtaqT-BiEHXV0Vwmk2QjaPEGRbuwuBzSNNGUdKbmzCx8eyNTrLjJ2Xz85-RH6JjgS4JlecWJ4IrtoAHhTOScSbqLBhgTkjOKi310ALDEGKvkBuh6amtdZ7fpDZ3P3nxY5NOg6zabgR1l46ABvPNGt76pR5muF9lzs7K1Cbrtoj1Ee04HsEebOUSz-7vX8WM-eXl4Gt9McsNK0uacLrSgc-aEKhaY2gI7SpyijhplaMmp0KKQzjFFicROOuoILu18LhSRxGI2RBd97jo2n52Ftlp5MDakS23TQcXKsqQE0wRP_8Fl08X0OagoE1gqyv6kmdgAROuqdfQrHb8qgqufDqu-wwTPN2kajA4u6tp42GpFSJF4cme968xH6uq9WUcLsF39G3fSsyW0TfyNKThTkkv2Dd-6gyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>237089230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Koizumi, Miyako ; Momose, Kuniyasu</creator><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Miyako ; Momose, Kuniyasu</creatorcontrib><description>The Penan Benalui, former hunter-gatherers, started becoming sedentary in the mid-1950s. They have a detailed classification system for wild plants and recognize many useful wild plants, but their use knowledge is relatively simple and differs from that of Bornean farmers. Men are more knowledgeable than women about forest plants. Men often hunt in the forest and collect forest products, whereas women spend most of their time in the village. This suggests that ethnobotanical knowledge is closely related to forest activities. At the same time, the Penan Benalui have more than enough knowledge from a utilitarian point of view, and gaining knowledge depends to some extent on personal experience. The nature of the Penan Benalui classification of wild plants does not support previous theories regarding the relationships among use, classification, and nomenclature of organisms. It is possible that nomenclature patterns affect the classification mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/517593</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal names ; Biological taxonomies ; Borneo ; Classification ; Crops ; Cultural anthropology ; Environmental studies ; Ethnobotany ; Flora ; Flowers & plants ; Forests ; Gender differences ; Gender roles ; Human paleontology ; Hunter gatherers ; Indigenous knowledge ; Leaves ; Mankind origin and evolution ; Methodology and general studies ; Native peoples ; Nomenclature ; Plant names ; Plants ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Subsistence farming ; Taxa ; Typology, technology and attribute analysis ; Wild plants</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2007-06, Vol.48 (3), p.454-459</ispartof><rights>2007 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2007 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-52da72b3f794d02e40f21f92f2c9c26527a748ff392180f8f2f106ebb79181e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-52da72b3f794d02e40f21f92f2c9c26527a748ff392180f8f2f106ebb79181e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19114086$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Miyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momose, Kuniyasu</creatorcontrib><title>Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>The Penan Benalui, former hunter-gatherers, started becoming sedentary in the mid-1950s. They have a detailed classification system for wild plants and recognize many useful wild plants, but their use knowledge is relatively simple and differs from that of Bornean farmers. Men are more knowledgeable than women about forest plants. Men often hunt in the forest and collect forest products, whereas women spend most of their time in the village. This suggests that ethnobotanical knowledge is closely related to forest activities. At the same time, the Penan Benalui have more than enough knowledge from a utilitarian point of view, and gaining knowledge depends to some extent on personal experience. The nature of the Penan Benalui classification of wild plants does not support previous theories regarding the relationships among use, classification, and nomenclature of organisms. It is possible that nomenclature patterns affect the classification mechanism.</description><subject>Animal names</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Borneo</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Ethnobotany</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Human paleontology</subject><subject>Hunter gatherers</subject><subject>Indigenous knowledge</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Mankind origin and evolution</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Nomenclature</subject><subject>Plant names</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Subsistence farming</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><subject>Wild plants</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0MtKAzEUBuAgCtaqT-BiEHXV0Vwmk2QjaPEGRbuwuBzSNNGUdKbmzCx8eyNTrLjJ2Xz85-RH6JjgS4JlecWJ4IrtoAHhTOScSbqLBhgTkjOKi310ALDEGKvkBuh6amtdZ7fpDZ3P3nxY5NOg6zabgR1l46ABvPNGt76pR5muF9lzs7K1Cbrtoj1Ee04HsEebOUSz-7vX8WM-eXl4Gt9McsNK0uacLrSgc-aEKhaY2gI7SpyijhplaMmp0KKQzjFFicROOuoILu18LhSRxGI2RBd97jo2n52Ftlp5MDakS23TQcXKsqQE0wRP_8Fl08X0OagoE1gqyv6kmdgAROuqdfQrHb8qgqufDqu-wwTPN2kajA4u6tp42GpFSJF4cme968xH6uq9WUcLsF39G3fSsyW0TfyNKThTkkv2Dd-6gyQ</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Koizumi, Miyako</creator><creator>Momose, Kuniyasu</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature</title><author>Koizumi, Miyako ; Momose, Kuniyasu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-52da72b3f794d02e40f21f92f2c9c26527a748ff392180f8f2f106ebb79181e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal names</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Borneo</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Ethnobotany</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Human paleontology</topic><topic>Hunter gatherers</topic><topic>Indigenous knowledge</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Mankind origin and evolution</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Nomenclature</topic><topic>Plant names</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Subsistence farming</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</topic><topic>Wild plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Miyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momose, Kuniyasu</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koizumi, Miyako</au><au>Momose, Kuniyasu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>454-459</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract>The Penan Benalui, former hunter-gatherers, started becoming sedentary in the mid-1950s. They have a detailed classification system for wild plants and recognize many useful wild plants, but their use knowledge is relatively simple and differs from that of Bornean farmers. Men are more knowledgeable than women about forest plants. Men often hunt in the forest and collect forest products, whereas women spend most of their time in the village. This suggests that ethnobotanical knowledge is closely related to forest activities. At the same time, the Penan Benalui have more than enough knowledge from a utilitarian point of view, and gaining knowledge depends to some extent on personal experience. The nature of the Penan Benalui classification of wild plants does not support previous theories regarding the relationships among use, classification, and nomenclature of organisms. It is possible that nomenclature patterns affect the classification mechanism.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/517593</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-3204 |
| ispartof | Current anthropology, 2007-06, Vol.48 (3), p.454-459 |
| issn | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_237089230 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Animal names Biological taxonomies Borneo Classification Crops Cultural anthropology Environmental studies Ethnobotany Flora Flowers & plants Forests Gender differences Gender roles Human paleontology Hunter gatherers Indigenous knowledge Leaves Mankind origin and evolution Methodology and general studies Native peoples Nomenclature Plant names Plants Prehistory and protohistory Subsistence farming Taxa Typology, technology and attribute analysis Wild plants |
| title | Penan Benalui Wild-Plant Use, Classification, and Nomenclature |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A16%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Penan%20Benalui%20Wild-Plant%20Use,%20Classification,%20and%20Nomenclature&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Koizumi,%20Miyako&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=454-459&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/517593&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/517593%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=237089230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/517593&rfr_iscdi=true |