Second Best and Monopoly: A Cautionary Tale
The theory of second best, as originally conceived by Meade (1955) and popularized by Lipsey and Lancaster (1956), has been a much discussed topic for quite some time now. Second best rules have been devised for a number of situations, but very little has been done in terms of trying to get a feel f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public choice 1981-01, Vol.37 (2), p.275-285 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The theory of second best, as originally conceived by Meade (1955) and popularized by Lipsey and Lancaster (1956), has been a much discussed topic for quite some time now. Second best rules have been devised for a number of situations, but very little has been done in terms of trying to get a feel for the magnitudes that may be involved. This paper intends to make a crude and tentative first step in this direction in the interest of making a similarly crude and tentative evaluation of the policy measures that the theory of second best might suggest. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00138247 |