Beyond counts and averages: Relating geodiversity to dimensions of biodiversity

Aim We may be able to buffer biodiversity against the effects of ongoing climate change by prioritizing the protection of habitat with diverse physical features (high geodiversity) associated with ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that maintain high biodiversity. Nonetheless, the relationships...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global ecology and biogeography 2020-04, Vol.29 (4), p.696-710
Hauptverfasser: Read, Quentin D., Zarnetske, Phoebe L., Record, Sydne, Dahlin, Kyla M., Costanza, Jennifer K., Finley, Andrew O., Gaddis, Keith D., Grady, John M., Hobi, Martina L., Latimer, Andrew M., Malone, Sparkle L., Ollinger, Scott V., Pau, Stephanie, Wilson, Adam M., Bahn, Volker
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim We may be able to buffer biodiversity against the effects of ongoing climate change by prioritizing the protection of habitat with diverse physical features (high geodiversity) associated with ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that maintain high biodiversity. Nonetheless, the relationships between biodiversity and habitat vary with spatial and biological context. In this study, we compare how well habitat geodiversity (spatial variation in abiotic processes and features) and climate explain biodiversity patterns of birds and trees. We also evaluate the consistency of biodiversity–geodiversity relationships across ecoregions. Location Contiguous USA. Time period 2007–2016. Taxa studied Birds and trees. Methods We quantified geodiversity with remotely sensed data and generated biodiversity maps from the Forest Inventory and Analysis and Breeding Bird Survey datasets. We fitted multivariate regressions to alpha, beta and gamma diversity, accounting for spatial autocorrelation among Nature Conservancy ecoregions and relationships among taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional biodiversity. We fitted models including climate alone (temperature and precipitation), geodiversity alone (topography, soil and geology) and climate plus geodiversity. Results A combination of geodiversity and climate predictor variables fitted most forms of bird and tree biodiversity with
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
DOI:10.1111/geb.13061