0359 Comparative Efficacy of Digital CBT-I Versus Stepped-care CBT-I to Reduce Comorbid Depression
Introduction Depression is commonly comorbid with insomnia and can be effectively targeted with digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I). Digital delivery of CBT-I is advantageous because it is highly accessible and requires minimal clinical resources; however, tradeoffs include th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.42 (Supplement_1), p.A146-A147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction Depression is commonly comorbid with insomnia and can be effectively targeted with digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I). Digital delivery of CBT-I is advantageous because it is highly accessible and requires minimal clinical resources; however, tradeoffs include the loss of clinician support and the ability to personalize treatment. A stepped-care model can optimize care by starting with a least resource intensive intervention (step 1: dCBT-I) and stepping-up non-remitters to specialized treatment (step 2: face-to-face CBT-I). This study tested the efficacy of a stepped-care approach to target co-morbid depression. Methods 261 individuals with insomnia (DSM-5 diagnostic criteria) were randomized into two conditions at step 1: dCBT-I (N=104), or an online sleep education control (N=157). Participants in the dCBT-I condition who did not show remission for insomnia (ISI>9) were further randomized to either face-to-face CBT-I (N=23) or sleep education (N=32). Depression (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology) was assessed at baseline, post-step 1, and post-step 2. Results Those who received stepped-care (dCBT-I to face-to-face CBT-I) achieved the same improvements in depression (pre-treatment QIDS: 6.9 ± 2.1 SD; post-treatment QIDS: 4.0 ± 3.2 SD) compared to those who remitted following only dCBT-I (pre-treatment QIDS: 7.2 ± 2.2 SD; post-treatment QIDS: 4.2 ± 2.2 SD). Furthermore, depression remission (QIDS ≤ 5) in the face-to-face CBT-I condition at step 2 (82.6%) was twice as high compared to the control condition at step 2 (40.6%), indicating that the stepped-care condition produced higher rates of depression remission compared to dCBT-I alone. Conclusion Preliminary evidence from this study provide suggest that a stepped-care approach that adds face-to-face CBT-I for non-remitters to dCBT-I may produce greater improvement in co-morbid depression than dCBT-I alone. Support (If Any) Support for this study was provided from the National Institute of Mental Health R56MH115150 awarded to Dr. Christopher Drake. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-8105 1550-9109 |
DOI: | 10.1093/sleep/zsz067.358 |