0200 The Prevalence of Controlled Rest as a Countermeasure to Sleepiness on the Flight Deck

Introduction Despite the introduction of flight, duty, and rest time regulations to reduce the risk of sleepiness, airline pilots often encounter elevated sleepiness during flight. To combat this sleepiness, in some instances, pilots can take a short nap on the flight deck (controlled rest) to impro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.42 (Supplement_1), p.A82-A82
Hauptverfasser: Hilditch, Cassie J, Arsintescu, Lucia, Gregory, Kevin B, Flynn-Evans, Erin E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Despite the introduction of flight, duty, and rest time regulations to reduce the risk of sleepiness, airline pilots often encounter elevated sleepiness during flight. To combat this sleepiness, in some instances, pilots can take a short nap on the flight deck (controlled rest) to improve their alertness. Little is known, however, as to when and how often this countermeasure is used operationally. Methods Forty pilots from a long-haul airline wore actiwatches and filled in an electronic sleep and work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in data from 238 flights. Self-reported in-flight rest periods were used to set rest intervals and sleep was estimated within these intervals using Philips Actiware 6.0.9 (Bend, OR). Wake threshold selection was set to medium; sleep threshold detection algorithm was set to 10 immobile minutes at sleep onset and sleep end. Timing of sleep periods was analyzed relative to home base time. Results Preliminary analyses showed that controlled rest was taken on 41.6% (n=99) of flights. On 8.8% of these flights (n=21), pilots reported taking two controlled rest periods. Sleep, as estimated by actigraphy, was achieved during 79.2% (n=95) of controlled rest periods. The mean (± SD) duration of controlled rest periods was 42.4 (± 9.7) minutes with a mean of 24.6 (± 16.1) minutes of sleep estimated within these rest periods. Approximately two-thirds (67.5%, n=81) of all rest periods were initiated during home base time night (0000h-0800h). On 23.2% (n=23) of flights with controlled rest, pilots also reported taking bunk rest (longer rest period in a designated onboard sleeping facility). Conclusion The data from this airline show that controlled rest is commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on the flight deck. Further analysis is required to determine what other factors contribute to the decision to take controlled rest, and how effective it is in reducing sleepiness on the flight deck. Support (If Any) NASA Airspace Operations and Safety Program, System-Wide Safety Project
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.199