Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: A cross-country analysis of complex audit clients

•Regulators around the world are concerned about the potentially harmful effects of high audit market concentration on audit pricing and quality.•However, results in the overall literature have failed to reach consensus on this issue.•We contribute to this debate by arguing that the audit market is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting and public policy 2019-11, Vol.38 (6), p.106693, Article 106693
Hauptverfasser: Gunn, Joshua L., Kawada, Brett S., Michas, Paul N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Regulators around the world are concerned about the potentially harmful effects of high audit market concentration on audit pricing and quality.•However, results in the overall literature have failed to reach consensus on this issue.•We contribute to this debate by arguing that the audit market is segmented and that concentration in the Big 4 segment of the market leads to higher audit pricing.•Accordingly, our analyses use international data and focus on concentration within the Big 4 group of firms across countries.•We find that audit fees are increasing in our concentration measure for clients where the barriers to entry by competing auditors are higher, as proxied by client size, international operations, and IFRS use.•Finally, we find evidence that audit quality is decreasing in Big 4 market concentration for these types of engagements.•This indicates a wealth transfer from shareholders to audit firms when auditor concentration is high because these complex clients are charged more, but receive audits that are of lower quality. Regulators around the world are concerned about the potentially harmful effects of high audit market concentration on audit pricing and quality. However, results in the overall literature have failed to reach consensus on this issue. We contribute to this debate by arguing that the audit market is segmented and that concentration in the Big 4 segment of the market leads to higher audit pricing. Accordingly, our analyses use international data and focus on concentration within the Big 4 group of firms across countries. We find that audit fees are increasing in our concentration measure for clients where the barriers to entry by competing auditors are higher, as proxied by client size, international operations, and IFRS use. Finally, we find evidence that audit quality is decreasing in Big 4 market concentration for these types of engagements. This indicates a wealth transfer from shareholders to audit firms when auditor concentration is high because these complex clients are charged more, but receive audits that are of lower quality.
ISSN:0278-4254
1873-2070
DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106693