Computational evaluation of effectiveness for intratumoral injection strategies in magnetic nanoparticle assisted thermotherapy
•Tumor volume division based intratumoral injection strategy.•Therapeutic effectiveness quantification in terms of thermal dosimetry.•Quantification of thermal damage in healthy tissues during thermotherapy.•Thermal effect in tissues after switching off the external magnetic field. To investigate, e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of heat and mass transfer 2020-02, Vol.148, p.119129, Article 119129 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Tumor volume division based intratumoral injection strategy.•Therapeutic effectiveness quantification in terms of thermal dosimetry.•Quantification of thermal damage in healthy tissues during thermotherapy.•Thermal effect in tissues after switching off the external magnetic field.
To investigate, evaluate, and compare the effectiveness of intratumoral magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) injection strategies (single-site and multi-site injection). The comparison is done with respect to a hypothetical case of uniform MNP distribution within tumor volume.
The injection strategies have been modeled in a three-dimensional tumor surrounded by healthy tissues while considering Gaussian spatial distribution of MNPs. In single-site injection strategy, the MNPs are injected at tumor centre, while in multi-site injection strategy the tumor is compartmentalized and injected at 9 sites (8 sites in compartments and one at tumor centre). The temperature field is computed in tissues during and after the thermo-therapy, by solving Pennes’ Bio-heat model, using finite volume method. From temperature field, effectiveness of each injection strategy is quantified in terms of thermal dosimetry, i.e. Arrhenius thermal damage and CEM 43 in tissues. The analysis has been done with two MNP injection doses (4 mg and 5 mg of MNPs/cm3 of tumor).
Temperature in multi-site injection strategy is more homogenous in comparison to single-site injection strategy. With injection dose of 5 mg of MNPs/cm3 of tumor, multi-site injection strategy thermally affects greater tumor volume than single-site injection strategy (17% in thermal damage, and 14 % in CEM 43). Multi-site injection strategy with 4 mg of MNPs/cm3 of tumor, produces almost equivalent thermal damage to tumor volume as single-site injection strategy with 5 mg of MNPs/cm3 of tumor. The thermal damage produced by multi-site injection strategy is very close to the damage in uniform MNP distribution. However, increased MNP spread in multi-site injection strategy affects greater healthy tissue volume.
Multi-site injection strategy performs better than single-site injection strategy. However, selection of injection site number, location, and amount of MNPs to be injected at each injection site plays a key role in optimization of this thermotherapy.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-9310 1879-2189 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119129 |