IF RACIAL DESEGREGATION, THEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE? ORIGINALISM AND THE SUPREME COURT'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
The Brown Court itself disavowed a theory of originalism in concluding that racially segragated public schools contravene the 14th Amendment, which deemed historical evidence of that Amendment's original meaning "inconclusive." Here, Bunch assesses scholars' reactions to defendin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard journal of law and public policy 2005-06, Vol.28 (3), p.781 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Brown Court itself disavowed a theory of originalism in concluding that racially segragated public schools contravene the 14th Amendment, which deemed historical evidence of that Amendment's original meaning "inconclusive." Here, Bunch assesses scholars' reactions to defending Brown's result in originalist terms. He concludes that the implications of originalism for state action mandating racial segregation and state policies against same-sex marriage are not rendered obsolete by the Court's 14th Amendment precedent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0193-4872 2374-6572 |