In vivo radiation dosimetry and image quality of turbo-flash and retrospective dual-source CT coronary angiography
Purpose To compare measured radiation dose (MD), estimated radiation dose (ED) and image quality in coronary computed tomography between turbo-flash (TFP) and retrospective protocol (RP) and correlate MD with size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). Materials and methods In this prospective study, we se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiologia medica 2020-02, Vol.125 (2), p.117-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To compare measured radiation dose (MD), estimated radiation dose (ED) and image quality in coronary computed tomography between turbo-flash (TFP) and retrospective protocol (RP) and correlate MD with size-specific dose estimates (SSDE).
Materials and methods
In this prospective study, we selected 68 patients (mean age, 59.2 ± 9.7 years) undergoing 192 × 2 dual-source CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens) to rule out coronary artery disease. Thirty-one underwent TFP and 37 RP. To evaluate in vivo MD, thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed, superficially, at thyroid and heart level, left breast areola and left hemi-thorax. MD in each site, and ED parameters, such as volume CT dose index (CTDI
vol
), SSDE, dose length product (DLP), effective dose (E), were compared between two protocols with a
t
test. Image quality was compared between two protocols. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated with a kappa coefficient (
k
). In each protocol, MD was correlated with SSDE using a Pearson coefficient (
r
).
Results
Comparing TFP and RP, MD at thyroid (1.43 vs. 2.58 mGy;
p
= 0.0408), heart (3.58 vs. 28.72 mGy;
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8362 1826-6983 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11547-019-01103-y |