Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data
Complex and costly discharge measurements are usually required to calibrate hydrological models. In contrast, water level measurements are straightforward, and practitioners can collect them using a crowdsourcing approach. Here we report how crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a lumped...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10856-10871 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10871 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 10856 |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Weeser, B. Jacobs, S. Kraft, P. Rufino, M. C. Breuer, L. |
description | Complex and costly discharge measurements are usually required to calibrate hydrological models. In contrast, water level measurements are straightforward, and practitioners can collect them using a crowdsourcing approach. Here we report how crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a lumped hydrological model. Using six different calibration schemes based on discharge or crowdsourced water levels, we assessed the value of crowdsourced data for hydrological modeling. As a benchmark, we used estimated discharge from automatically measured water levels and identified 2,500 parameter sets that resulted in the highest Nash‐Sutcliffe‐Efficiencies in a Monte Carlo‐based uncertainty framework (Q‐NSE). Spearman‐Rank‐Coefficients between crowdsourced water levels and modeled discharge (CS‐SR) or observed discharge and modeled discharge (Q‐SR) were used as an alternative way to calibrate the model. Additionally, we applied a filtering scheme (F), where we removed parameter sets, which resulted in a runoff that did not agree with the water balance derived from measured precipitation and publicly available remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. For the Q‐NSE scheme, we achieved a mean NSE of 0.88, while NSEs of 0.43 and 0.36 were found for Q‐SR and CS‐SR, respectively. Within the filter schemes, NSEs approached the values achieved with the discharge calibrated model (Q‐SRF 0.7, CS‐SRF 0.69). Similar results were found for the validation period with slightly better efficiencies. With this study we demonstrate how crowdsourced water levels can be effectively used to calibrate a rainfall‐runoff model, making this modeling approach a potential tool for ungauged catchments.
Key Points
Crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model
Combining crowdsourced water levels with a water balance derived from remotely sensed evapotranspiration increases the model efficiency
Time‐variable‐collected water levels can be converted into a continuous discharge time series using a simple model approach |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019WR025248 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346596414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2346596414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3680-76f0ecb18814b9054edb839ba93d8f9835711ce9acf5378dbc8c548a185463ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpbDxAJFYCdu4c2wsSCp9SEVJE1dFyHBulCkmxW6puPALPyJOQqgxMLHfL7z70J-SU0QtGM3WZUaZmJc14hnKPjJhCTIUSsE9GlCKkDJQ4JEcxzillyHMxIlelaTpv2vb786tcdb33yVNfu7bpXpNp3NYi9Os69qtgXZ3MzNKFZOI-XJvcmKU5JgfDcHQnv31Mpne3L8VDOnm-fyyuJ6mBXNJU5J46WzEpGVaKcnR1JUFVRkEtvZLABWPWKWM9ByHrykrLURomOeZgLIzJ2W7vIvTvKxeXej581A0ndQaYc5Ujw0Gd75QNfYzBeb0IzZsJG82o3iak_yY0cNjxddO6zb9Wz8qizBCQwg89NWca</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346596414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Weeser, B. ; Jacobs, S. ; Kraft, P. ; Rufino, M. C. ; Breuer, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weeser, B. ; Jacobs, S. ; Kraft, P. ; Rufino, M. C. ; Breuer, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Complex and costly discharge measurements are usually required to calibrate hydrological models. In contrast, water level measurements are straightforward, and practitioners can collect them using a crowdsourcing approach. Here we report how crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a lumped hydrological model. Using six different calibration schemes based on discharge or crowdsourced water levels, we assessed the value of crowdsourced data for hydrological modeling. As a benchmark, we used estimated discharge from automatically measured water levels and identified 2,500 parameter sets that resulted in the highest Nash‐Sutcliffe‐Efficiencies in a Monte Carlo‐based uncertainty framework (Q‐NSE). Spearman‐Rank‐Coefficients between crowdsourced water levels and modeled discharge (CS‐SR) or observed discharge and modeled discharge (Q‐SR) were used as an alternative way to calibrate the model. Additionally, we applied a filtering scheme (F), where we removed parameter sets, which resulted in a runoff that did not agree with the water balance derived from measured precipitation and publicly available remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. For the Q‐NSE scheme, we achieved a mean NSE of 0.88, while NSEs of 0.43 and 0.36 were found for Q‐SR and CS‐SR, respectively. Within the filter schemes, NSEs approached the values achieved with the discharge calibrated model (Q‐SRF 0.7, CS‐SRF 0.69). Similar results were found for the validation period with slightly better efficiencies. With this study we demonstrate how crowdsourced water levels can be effectively used to calibrate a rainfall‐runoff model, making this modeling approach a potential tool for ungauged catchments.
Key Points
Crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model
Combining crowdsourced water levels with a water balance derived from remotely sensed evapotranspiration increases the model efficiency
Time‐variable‐collected water levels can be converted into a continuous discharge time series using a simple model approach</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; citizen science ; Coefficients ; Computer simulation ; crowdsource ; Crowdsourcing ; discharge ; Discharge estimation ; Evapotranspiration ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Modelling ; Parameter identification ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall-runoff relationships ; rainfall‐runoff modeling ; Remote sensing ; Runoff ; Statistical methods ; Water balance ; Water discharge ; water level ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10856-10871</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3680-76f0ecb18814b9054edb839ba93d8f9835711ce9acf5378dbc8c548a185463ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3680-76f0ecb18814b9054edb839ba93d8f9835711ce9acf5378dbc8c548a185463ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR025248$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR025248$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,11497,27907,27908,45557,45558,46451,46875</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weeser, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rufino, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Complex and costly discharge measurements are usually required to calibrate hydrological models. In contrast, water level measurements are straightforward, and practitioners can collect them using a crowdsourcing approach. Here we report how crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a lumped hydrological model. Using six different calibration schemes based on discharge or crowdsourced water levels, we assessed the value of crowdsourced data for hydrological modeling. As a benchmark, we used estimated discharge from automatically measured water levels and identified 2,500 parameter sets that resulted in the highest Nash‐Sutcliffe‐Efficiencies in a Monte Carlo‐based uncertainty framework (Q‐NSE). Spearman‐Rank‐Coefficients between crowdsourced water levels and modeled discharge (CS‐SR) or observed discharge and modeled discharge (Q‐SR) were used as an alternative way to calibrate the model. Additionally, we applied a filtering scheme (F), where we removed parameter sets, which resulted in a runoff that did not agree with the water balance derived from measured precipitation and publicly available remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. For the Q‐NSE scheme, we achieved a mean NSE of 0.88, while NSEs of 0.43 and 0.36 were found for Q‐SR and CS‐SR, respectively. Within the filter schemes, NSEs approached the values achieved with the discharge calibrated model (Q‐SRF 0.7, CS‐SRF 0.69). Similar results were found for the validation period with slightly better efficiencies. With this study we demonstrate how crowdsourced water levels can be effectively used to calibrate a rainfall‐runoff model, making this modeling approach a potential tool for ungauged catchments.
Key Points
Crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model
Combining crowdsourced water levels with a water balance derived from remotely sensed evapotranspiration increases the model efficiency
Time‐variable‐collected water levels can be converted into a continuous discharge time series using a simple model approach</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>crowdsource</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>discharge</subject><subject>Discharge estimation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff relationships</subject><subject>rainfall‐runoff modeling</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water discharge</subject><subject>water level</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpbDxAJFYCdu4c2wsSCp9SEVJE1dFyHBulCkmxW6puPALPyJOQqgxMLHfL7z70J-SU0QtGM3WZUaZmJc14hnKPjJhCTIUSsE9GlCKkDJQ4JEcxzillyHMxIlelaTpv2vb786tcdb33yVNfu7bpXpNp3NYi9Os69qtgXZ3MzNKFZOI-XJvcmKU5JgfDcHQnv31Mpne3L8VDOnm-fyyuJ6mBXNJU5J46WzEpGVaKcnR1JUFVRkEtvZLABWPWKWM9ByHrykrLURomOeZgLIzJ2W7vIvTvKxeXej581A0ndQaYc5Ujw0Gd75QNfYzBeb0IzZsJG82o3iak_yY0cNjxddO6zb9Wz8qizBCQwg89NWca</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Weeser, B.</creator><creator>Jacobs, S.</creator><creator>Kraft, P.</creator><creator>Rufino, M. C.</creator><creator>Breuer, L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data</title><author>Weeser, B. ; Jacobs, S. ; Kraft, P. ; Rufino, M. C. ; Breuer, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3680-76f0ecb18814b9054edb839ba93d8f9835711ce9acf5378dbc8c548a185463ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>crowdsource</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>discharge</topic><topic>Discharge estimation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff relationships</topic><topic>rainfall‐runoff modeling</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water discharge</topic><topic>water level</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weeser, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rufino, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weeser, B.</au><au>Jacobs, S.</au><au>Kraft, P.</au><au>Rufino, M. C.</au><au>Breuer, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>10856</spage><epage>10871</epage><pages>10856-10871</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Complex and costly discharge measurements are usually required to calibrate hydrological models. In contrast, water level measurements are straightforward, and practitioners can collect them using a crowdsourcing approach. Here we report how crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a lumped hydrological model. Using six different calibration schemes based on discharge or crowdsourced water levels, we assessed the value of crowdsourced data for hydrological modeling. As a benchmark, we used estimated discharge from automatically measured water levels and identified 2,500 parameter sets that resulted in the highest Nash‐Sutcliffe‐Efficiencies in a Monte Carlo‐based uncertainty framework (Q‐NSE). Spearman‐Rank‐Coefficients between crowdsourced water levels and modeled discharge (CS‐SR) or observed discharge and modeled discharge (Q‐SR) were used as an alternative way to calibrate the model. Additionally, we applied a filtering scheme (F), where we removed parameter sets, which resulted in a runoff that did not agree with the water balance derived from measured precipitation and publicly available remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. For the Q‐NSE scheme, we achieved a mean NSE of 0.88, while NSEs of 0.43 and 0.36 were found for Q‐SR and CS‐SR, respectively. Within the filter schemes, NSEs approached the values achieved with the discharge calibrated model (Q‐SRF 0.7, CS‐SRF 0.69). Similar results were found for the validation period with slightly better efficiencies. With this study we demonstrate how crowdsourced water levels can be effectively used to calibrate a rainfall‐runoff model, making this modeling approach a potential tool for ungauged catchments.
Key Points
Crowdsourced water levels were used to calibrate a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model
Combining crowdsourced water levels with a water balance derived from remotely sensed evapotranspiration increases the model efficiency
Time‐variable‐collected water levels can be converted into a continuous discharge time series using a simple model approach</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR025248</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10856-10871 |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2346596414 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Calibration Catchment area Catchments citizen science Coefficients Computer simulation crowdsource Crowdsourcing discharge Discharge estimation Evapotranspiration Hydrologic data Hydrologic models Hydrology Modelling Parameter identification Rain Rainfall Rainfall-runoff relationships rainfall‐runoff modeling Remote sensing Runoff Statistical methods Water balance Water discharge water level Water levels |
title | Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Using Crowdsourced Water Level Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rainfall%E2%80%90Runoff%20Modeling%20Using%20Crowdsourced%20Water%20Level%20Data&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Weeser,%20B.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=10856&rft.epage=10871&rft.pages=10856-10871&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR025248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346596414%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346596414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |