Systematic Uncertainties in Plasma Parameters Reported by the Fast Plasma Investigation on NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission

Systematic uncertainties in the conversion of measured counts to phase space density by charged particle instrumentation result in errors in reported plasma moments (e.g., density, velocity, and temperature). Unlike previous particle instrumentation that relied on a spacecraft spin to sample all loo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2019-12, Vol.124 (12), p.10345-10359
Hauptverfasser: Gershman, Daniel J., Dorelli, John C., Avanov, Levon A., Gliese, Ulrik, Barrie, Alexander, Schiff, Conrad, Da Silva, Daniel E., Paterson, William R., Giles, Barbara L., Pollock, Craig J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Systematic uncertainties in the conversion of measured counts to phase space density by charged particle instrumentation result in errors in reported plasma moments (e.g., density, velocity, and temperature). Unlike previous particle instrumentation that relied on a spacecraft spin to sample all look‐directions, the Fast Plasma Investigation (FPI) suite on NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission nearly simultaneously images the full sky. This configuration results in unprecedented time resolution but also introduces the possibility of spin tones in plasma moments, in particular electron bulk velocity. Here we characterize the effect of systematic linear errors of corrected FPI phase space densities on its reported plasma moments. We find that the flat‐fielding correction factors (i.e., scale factor errors) of FPI are typically accurate to within a few percent but can nonetheless result in significant spin tones in magnetospheric plasmas. Key Points The flat‐field correction factors for the Fast Plasma Investigation suite on MMS are typically accurate to within a few percent Background errors can be corrected for at the moment level if appropriate models are available Imperfect flat‐field correction factors result in systematic biases in plasma moments
ISSN:2169-9380
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2019JA026980