Comparative study on thermal behaviors between micrites and thrombolites using thermogravimetric analysis

Although micrites (abiotic limestone) and thrombolites (typical biotic limestone), according to the sedimentation and biological action, can be primarily distinguished from intuitively field observation and rock slices analysis. However, further analysis of thermal decomposition unique characteristi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 2020, Vol.139 (2), p.1229-1242
Hauptverfasser: Han, Zuozhen, Zhuang, Dingxiang, Zhao, Hui, Yan, Huaxiao, Mao, Guangzhou, Yao, Changhong, Wang, Jiajia, Bi, Zhenpeng, Shan, Guanghe, Pan, Juntong, Sun, Xiaoxu, Zhao, Yifan, Yang, Yumo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although micrites (abiotic limestone) and thrombolites (typical biotic limestone), according to the sedimentation and biological action, can be primarily distinguished from intuitively field observation and rock slices analysis. However, further analysis of thermal decomposition unique characteristics to distinguish them has rarely been reported. Here, the comparative studies of thermal decomposition behavior between micrites and thrombolites were carefully investigated using thermogravimetric analyzer in nitrogen atmosphere at multi-heating rates of 5, 10, 20 and 30 K min −1 from 323.15 to 1273.15 K. Moreover, the mineralogical compositions were both analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction followed by the results of calcite acting as the basic constituent for further verified. The kinetic model function and kinetic parameters were calculated by Flynn–Wall–Ozawa, Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose and Popescu methods, respectively. The results showed that the kinetic parameter activation energy ( E ) of thrombolites was obviously higher than that of micrites, which suggests the former have a higher crystallinity. In addition, the results of difference significance analysis showed extremely significant differences ( P  
ISSN:1388-6150
1588-2926
DOI:10.1007/s10973-019-08559-0