Radiation exposure during cardiac device implantation: Lessons learned from a multicenter registry

Background Little data are available about radiation exposure during cardiac electrical device implantation, and no dose reference levels have been published. This multicenter, prospective, observational study assesses patient and staff radiation exposure during cardiac device implantations, and aim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2020-01, Vol.43 (1), p.87-92
Hauptverfasser: Bru, Paul, Dompnier, Antoine, Amara, Walid, Haddad, Georges, Galuscan, Gianina, Sagnol, Pascal, Steinbach, Mathieu, Montagnier, Christian, Taieb, Jérôme, Beguec, Julien, Milhem, Antoine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Little data are available about radiation exposure during cardiac electrical device implantation, and no dose reference levels have been published. This multicenter, prospective, observational study assesses patient and staff radiation exposure during cardiac device implantations, and aims at defining dose reference levels. Methods Patient demographic, procedural, and radiation data were obtained for 657 procedures from nine institutions. Physician and staff exposure were measured using real‐time dosimeters worn beneath and above lead apron. Statistical analysis included fluoroscopy time (FT), dose‐area product (DAP), and DAP adjusted for FT and body mass index. Results Pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 481 and 176 patients, respectively. Of these, 152 were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Median FTs were 837s (interquartile range [IQR]: 480‐1323), 117s (IQR: 69‐209), and 101s (IQR: 58‐162), and median DAPs were 1410 (IQR: 807‐2601), 150 (IQR: 72‐338), and 129 (IQR: 72‐332) cGy.cm² for biventricular, dual chamber, and ventricular device implantation, respectively. Dose reference levels correspond to the third quartile values. During CRT, higher exposure was observed with four X‐ray systems than with the two newer and customizable ones (adjusted DAP of 0.90 [IQR: 0.26‐1.01] and 0.29 [IQR: 0.23‐0.39], respectively; P 
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.13842