0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation
BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A11 |
container_title | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Collins, Sandra Crowther, Nicola McCabe, Anne Natarajan, Michael Jones, Kevin |
description | BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2338038155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2338038155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b705-513a4ba25f2bec35dbd4dc787c4fbd9727d2ef61957d4421164c7d8b4dcf0d9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkLtqwzAUQEWh0JDmF4qhs1JdyZLsbiX0SaBDvQu9bMvYcWrZQ7Yu_dF-SR2cu9zhHO6Fg9AdkC0AEw-ma-LoW0wJcEzmkXxLxRVaUcIFFiKXN2gTYzMTkGfOVuiDACV_P79fofNjHWx8TAqvbR0OVdJ5F6xukwUkYz30U1UndahqXAbn2zCekhi6qdVj6A-36LrUbfSby16j4uW52L3h_efr--5pj40kHHNgOjWa8pIabxl3xqXOykzatDQul1Q66ksBOZcuTSmASK10mZmlkrhcszW6X84eh_578nFUTT8Nh_mjooxlhGXA-WzBYs1R1HEInR5OCog6h1KXUOocSi2hFBXsH9ZGYCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338038155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation</title><source>Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Collins, Sandra ; Crowther, Nicola ; McCabe, Anne ; Natarajan, Michael ; Jones, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sandra ; Crowther, Nicola ; McCabe, Anne ; Natarajan, Michael ; Jones, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value <0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.33.Capacity: This scenario showed an improved perceived relevance of 1.01/10 (p-value 0.0015) from 8.58 to 9.59. Student’s confidence with management improved by 1.94/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 6.70 to 8.64.Best interests: Students reported an improved awareness of 1.03/10 (p-value < 0.0052) from 8.58 to 9.61. The student’s confidence with management improved by 2.30/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.27.Students commented in the feedback that there was a ‘massive difference to learning in real time than textbook’ and it made the ethics teaching ‘much more fun and more memorable.’RecommendationsWe hope to expand this teaching to students within other healthcare professions and postgraduate healthcare professionals.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2056-6697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Feedback ; Medical students ; Simulation ; Students ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A11</ispartof><rights>2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2015 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation</title><title>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</title><description>BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value <0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.33.Capacity: This scenario showed an improved perceived relevance of 1.01/10 (p-value 0.0015) from 8.58 to 9.59. Student’s confidence with management improved by 1.94/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 6.70 to 8.64.Best interests: Students reported an improved awareness of 1.03/10 (p-value < 0.0052) from 8.58 to 9.61. The student’s confidence with management improved by 2.30/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.27.Students commented in the feedback that there was a ‘massive difference to learning in real time than textbook’ and it made the ethics teaching ‘much more fun and more memorable.’RecommendationsWe hope to expand this teaching to students within other healthcare professions and postgraduate healthcare professionals.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>2056-6697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotkLtqwzAUQEWh0JDmF4qhs1JdyZLsbiX0SaBDvQu9bMvYcWrZQ7Yu_dF-SR2cu9zhHO6Fg9AdkC0AEw-ma-LoW0wJcEzmkXxLxRVaUcIFFiKXN2gTYzMTkGfOVuiDACV_P79fofNjHWx8TAqvbR0OVdJ5F6xukwUkYz30U1UndahqXAbn2zCekhi6qdVj6A-36LrUbfSby16j4uW52L3h_efr--5pj40kHHNgOjWa8pIabxl3xqXOykzatDQul1Q66ksBOZcuTSmASK10mZmlkrhcszW6X84eh_578nFUTT8Nh_mjooxlhGXA-WzBYs1R1HEInR5OCog6h1KXUOocSi2hFBXsH9ZGYCs</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Collins, Sandra</creator><creator>Crowther, Nicola</creator><creator>McCabe, Anne</creator><creator>Natarajan, Michael</creator><creator>Jones, Kevin</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation</title><author>Collins, Sandra ; Crowther, Nicola ; McCabe, Anne ; Natarajan, Michael ; Jones, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b705-513a4ba25f2bec35dbd4dc787c4fbd9727d2ef61957d4421164c7d8b4dcf0d9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Sandra</au><au>Crowther, Nicola</au><au>McCabe, Anne</au><au>Natarajan, Michael</au><au>Jones, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation</atitle><jtitle>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</jtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A11</spage><pages>A11-</pages><eissn>2056-6697</eissn><abstract>BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value <0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.33.Capacity: This scenario showed an improved perceived relevance of 1.01/10 (p-value 0.0015) from 8.58 to 9.59. Student’s confidence with management improved by 1.94/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 6.70 to 8.64.Best interests: Students reported an improved awareness of 1.03/10 (p-value < 0.0052) from 8.58 to 9.61. The student’s confidence with management improved by 2.30/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.27.Students commented in the feedback that there was a ‘massive difference to learning in real time than textbook’ and it made the ethics teaching ‘much more fun and more memorable.’RecommendationsWe hope to expand this teaching to students within other healthcare professions and postgraduate healthcare professionals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2056-6697 |
ispartof | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A11 |
issn | 2056-6697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2338038155 |
source | Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ethics Feedback Medical students Simulation Students Teaching |
title | 0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A27%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=0120%E2%80%85Simethics:%20Teaching%20medical%20ethics%20through%20high-fidelity%20simulation&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20simulation%20&%20technology%20enhanced%20learning&rft.au=Collins,%20Sandra&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A11&rft.pages=A11-&rft.eissn=2056-6697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2338038155%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338038155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |