0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation

BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A11
Hauptverfasser: Collins, Sandra, Crowther, Nicola, McCabe, Anne, Natarajan, Michael, Jones, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value
ISSN:2056-6697
DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26