0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation
BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BackgroundEffective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients’ experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases.MethodologyWe identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient’s best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students.ResultsThirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales.Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2056-6697 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26 |