The use of canon law in ecclesiastical administration, 1000–1234. Edited by Melodie Eichbauer and Danica Summerlin. (Medieval Law and its Practice, 26.) Pp. xii + 279 incl. 1 table. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2019. €121. 978 90 04 36433 2; 1873 8176
[...]this raises the question of what criteria made some authorities more favourable than others to the commentators. [...]Kathleen Cushing and Louis Hamilton address the legal arguments of the Libelli de lite and the exegesis of Bruno of Segni respectively. Bruce Brasington – offering, as a good ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecclesiastical history 2020, Vol.71 (1), p.164-165 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [...]this raises the question of what criteria made some authorities more favourable than others to the commentators. [...]Kathleen Cushing and Louis Hamilton address the legal arguments of the Libelli de lite and the exegesis of Bruno of Segni respectively. Bruce Brasington – offering, as a good canonist should, a commentary and integration of the chapters (dicta Brasingtoni?) – ends by noting that the essays contribute to the destruction of a ‘static’ interpretation of canon law; ‘what is fixed is not easily moved, not easily used’ (a pithy sentence worth squirrelling away for future use). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-0469 1469-7637 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0022046919001921 |