The use of canon law in ecclesiastical administration, 1000–1234. Edited by Melodie Eichbauer and Danica Summerlin. (Medieval Law and its Practice, 26.) Pp. xii + 279 incl. 1 table. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2019. €121. 978 90 04 36433 2; 1873 8176

[...]this raises the question of what criteria made some authorities more favourable than others to the commentators. [...]Kathleen Cushing and Louis Hamilton address the legal arguments of the Libelli de lite and the exegesis of Bruno of Segni respectively. Bruce Brasington – offering, as a good ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecclesiastical history 2020, Vol.71 (1), p.164-165
1. Verfasser: Wiedemann, Benedict G. E.
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[...]this raises the question of what criteria made some authorities more favourable than others to the commentators. [...]Kathleen Cushing and Louis Hamilton address the legal arguments of the Libelli de lite and the exegesis of Bruno of Segni respectively. Bruce Brasington – offering, as a good canonist should, a commentary and integration of the chapters (dicta Brasingtoni?) – ends by noting that the essays contribute to the destruction of a ‘static’ interpretation of canon law; ‘what is fixed is not easily moved, not easily used’ (a pithy sentence worth squirrelling away for future use).
ISSN:0022-0469
1469-7637
DOI:10.1017/S0022046919001921