Gas chromatography−mass spectrometry analysis of non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids by degradation product formation

Steroid detection and identification remain key issues in toxicology, drug testing, medical diagnostics, food safety control, and doping control. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities and usefulness of analyzing non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids with gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC–MS)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug testing and analysis 2019-11, Vol.11 (11-12), p.1656-1665
Hauptverfasser: Polet, Michael, Van Gansbeke, Wim, Albertsdóttir, Aðalheiður Dóra, Coppieters, Gilles, Deventer, Koen, Van Eenoo, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Steroid detection and identification remain key issues in toxicology, drug testing, medical diagnostics, food safety control, and doping control. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities and usefulness of analyzing non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids with gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC–MS) instead of the conventionally applied liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry (LC–MS) approach. Sulfates of 31 steroids were synthesized and their MS and chromatographic behavior studied by chemical ionization−GC−triple quadrupole MS (CI−GC‐TQMS) and low energy−electron ionization−GC−quadrupole time‐of‐flight−MS (LE−EI−GC−QTOF−MS). The collected data shows that the sulfate group is cleaved off in the injection port of the GC–MS, forming two isomers. In CI, the dominant species (ie, [MH – H2SO4]+ or [MH – H4S2O8]+ for bis‐sulfates) is very abundant due to the limited amount of fragmentation, making it an ideal precursor ion for MS/MS. In LE−EI, [M – H2SO4].+ and/or [M – H2SO4 – CH3].+ are the dominant species in most cases. Based on the common GC–MS behavior of non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids, two applications were evaluated and compared with the conventionally applied LC–MS approach; (a) discovery of (new) sulfated steroid metabolites of mesterolone and (b) expanding anabolic androgenic steroid abuse detection windows. GC–MS and LC–MS analysis of non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids offered comparable sensitivities, superseding these of GC–MS after hydrolysis. For non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids, GC–MS offers a higher structural elucidating power and a more straightforward inclusion in screening methods than LC–MS. In this study, we evaluate analyzing non‐hydrolyzed sulfated steroids with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) instead of the conventionally applied liquid chromatography MS approach. Their MS and chromatographic behavior was studied by chemical ionization GC triple quadrupole MS and GC quadrupole time‐of‐flight MS. The collected data shows that the sulfate group is cleaved off in the injection port of the GC‐MS, forming two isomers. GC‐MS offers a high structural elucidating power and a more straight forward inclusion in screening methods.
ISSN:1942-7603
1942-7611
DOI:10.1002/dta.2606