Deal-protection measures and the merger recommendation
One of the more persistent and vibrant debates in the otherwise staid corridors of corporate law addresses the tension between the contract rights created by deal-protection measures in a merger agreement and the fiduciary duties of directors in responding to post-contracting events. This debate is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Northwestern University law review 2002-12, Vol.96 (2), p.467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the more persistent and vibrant debates in the otherwise staid corridors of corporate law addresses the tension between the contract rights created by deal-protection measures in a merger agreement and the fiduciary duties of directors in responding to post-contracting events. This debate is considered in light of the Delaware Supreme Court's decision in "Smith v. Van Gorkom." |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-3571 |