Curry to treat Alzheimer’s disease?

Purpose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the major cause of dementia in the world with increasing evidence of the retina being affected. Since no cure exists, the development of new treatments is an urgent unmet need. Curcumin, a natural polyphenol found in curry, has been advocated as a potential neurop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2019-12, Vol.97 (S263), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Shamsher, Ehtesham, Guo, Li, Davis, Benjamin M., Luong, Vy, Ravindran, Nivedita, Somavarapu, Satyanarayana, Cordeiro, M. Francesca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the major cause of dementia in the world with increasing evidence of the retina being affected. Since no cure exists, the development of new treatments is an urgent unmet need. Curcumin, a natural polyphenol found in curry, has been advocated as a potential neuroprotectant in AD. However, its poor solubility in water and low bioavailability, have limited its clinical translation. In this study we describe a novel curcumin nanoparticle (CN) formulation and evaluate its neuroprotective efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Methods CNs were formulated using a thin film rehydration technique. R28 cells were used to assess CN neuroprotective activity. For in vivo studies 10‐month‐old 3xTg‐AD mice were treated intranasally 5 days/week with 3 μl of either CNs (n = 7) or vehicle (n = 6). After three months of treatment, animals had DARC (Detection of Apoptosing Retinal Cells) imaging and their brains (amyloid‐beta) were immunostained. All results are given with the standard error and the statistical test used is a student T‐test. Results CN formulation incorporating over 4 mg/ml of curcumin was stable over 90 days. CNs protected R28 cells against a) glutamate excitotoxicity with an IC50 of 22.36 ± 0.50 mm versus 4.54 ± 0.32 mm for control group (p 
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2019.5445