Pragmatic ex-ante evaluation using an innovative conceptual framework: The case of a high-tech entrepreneurship program for women
•Evaluation practice within EU framework underutilizes knowledge of implementers.•A pragmatic ex-ante evaluation scheme for practitioners promoting GE is provided.•Constant pressure to apply for funds characterize everyday business on local level.•The evaluation scheme allows policy learning and loo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation and program planning 2019-12, Vol.77, p.101714, Article 101714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Evaluation practice within EU framework underutilizes knowledge of implementers.•A pragmatic ex-ante evaluation scheme for practitioners promoting GE is provided.•Constant pressure to apply for funds characterize everyday business on local level.•The evaluation scheme allows policy learning and looking into the ‘black box’.
Program designers at local project level usually design interventions under conditions of scarce resources and bounded rationality lacking sufficient information about the process and impact mechanisms of the complex social programs they design and implement. This paper proposes a model for pragmatic ex ante evaluation using an innovative conceptual framework for practitioners working in the field to improve gender equality in research and innovation.
The presented and applied model is pertinent to the theory-oriented evaluation tradition using a logic frame and a theory of change approach adapted to the special requirements of ex-ante evaluation. The model is illustrated by the case study of a program for the promotion of women entrepreneurship in the STEM fields.
It is concluded that in a setting with limited resources and information, ex-ante evaluations should aim at defining clear conditions of proportionality and need to take into account the extent to which contextual factors hinder or facilitate the implementation of a program, and the specific institutional and system mechanisms at play, in order to enable proactive risk management from the beginning. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-7189 1873-7870 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101714 |