General instruments for risk assessment
PURPOSE OF REVIEWThe identification of those who may be at increased risk of exhibiting violence is one of the highest-profile tasks of mental health professionals. Risk assessment is a rapidly developing field, and a number of instruments have been proposed for facilitating this task. RECENT FINDIN...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in psychiatry 2004-09, Vol.17 (5), p.401-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSE OF REVIEWThe identification of those who may be at increased risk of exhibiting violence is one of the highest-profile tasks of mental health professionals. Risk assessment is a rapidly developing field, and a number of instruments have been proposed for facilitating this task.
RECENT FINDINGSThis article summarizes the main developments in the field of risk assessment and examines the key themes that have emerged over the past year. It discusses recent findings concerning comparisons between risk-assessment instruments and ways of optimizing the predictive accuracy of risk-assessment tools. A trend over the past year has been that risk assessment has begun to be seen as a multi-disciplinary task rather than falling within the remit of a single professional group. Several papers in the past year have explored issues concerned with the practical application of risk-assessment instruments.
SUMMARYRisk-assessment instruments can play a valuable role in identifying those who may be at increased risk of exhibiting violent behaviour. However, they should be interpreted with caution rather than being regarded as fixed entities. Practitioners should be aware that all risk-assessment instruments are ‘works in progress’ and are likely to require ongoing revision. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0951-7367 1473-6578 |
DOI: | 10.1097/01.yco.0000139978.68060.5a |