How Deeply Do Second Language Learners Process Written Corrective Feedback? Insights Gained From Think-Alouds

This research compares how second language learners process two types of written feedback: reformulation and direct correction. On a two-stage composition-and-comparison task, 22 adult learners of English as a second language taking an academic writing course at a large midwestern U.S. university pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:TESOL quarterly 2019-12, Vol.53 (4), p.913-938
Hauptverfasser: KIM, HA RAM, BOWLES, MELISSA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This research compares how second language learners process two types of written feedback: reformulation and direct correction. On a two-stage composition-and-comparison task, 22 adult learners of English as a second language taking an academic writing course at a large midwestern U.S. university participated in a repeated-measures study in which they wrote two argumentative essays and received feedback in the form of reformulation on one and direct correction on the other in counterbalanced fashion. During the comparison stage for each essay, learners completed think-alouds, which were used to gauge how they processed the two types of feedback. The findings reveal that learners processed sentential and paragraph-level errors more deeply but overlooked surface-level errors when they received reformulation as feedback; the reverse was the case when they received direct correction. Results therefore suggest that there may not be a one-size-fits-all answer for written corrective feedback but that different errors respond to feedback differently.
ISSN:0039-8322
1545-7249
DOI:10.1002/tesq.522