Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility
Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer 2006-10, Vol.20 (4), p.672-679 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 679 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 672 |
| container_title | Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Park, Chul Raiche, George A Driver, David M Olejniczak, Joseph Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda Hightower, T. Mark Sakai, Takeharu |
| description | Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.15744 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2311998584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311998584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-5f334063d211616584c1d9ad285d60c174c0c975e37a527946d252bdf189333e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtrGzEUhUVoIW4a-hcG0jRkMa6uHjOapbHjPHDoJl2LG41EZMajqSRD_e87zRgCaVd3cT6-czmEfAE6ZxLEd5iDrIU4ITOQnJeVouoDmVGl6lLVjJ2STyltKYVK1TAjq2XYDRh9Cn0RXHHT5xfshkOxstnGne8x-zF5tPkltKlwIRbYF4toygebizUa3_l8-Ew-OuySPT_eM_JzffO0vCs3P27vl4tNiULwXErHuaAVbxlABZVUwkDbYMuUbCtqoBaGmqaWltcoWd2IqmWSPbcOVMM5t_yMfJu8Qwy_9jZlvfPJ2K7D3oZ90qwBylklR_DiHbgN-9iPv2nGAZpGjeUjdTVRJoaUonV6iH6H8aCB6r9batCvW47k5dGHyWDnIvbGpzdcMeCT8evEoUd86_xXd_1fbIr10Drt9l2X7e_M_wBkOYmK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311998584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, Chul ; Raiche, George A ; Driver, David M ; Olejniczak, Joseph ; Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda ; Hightower, T. Mark ; Sakai, Takeharu</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Chul ; Raiche, George A ; Driver, David M ; Olejniczak, Joseph ; Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda ; Hightower, T. Mark ; Sakai, Takeharu</creatorcontrib><description>Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-8722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6808</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.15744</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTHTEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Enthalpy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Instrumentation for fluid dynamics ; Nonequilibrium gas dynamics ; Physics ; Reactive, radiative, or nonequilibrium flows</subject><ispartof>Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer, 2006-10, Vol.20 (4), p.672-679</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-5f334063d211616584c1d9ad285d60c174c0c975e37a527946d252bdf189333e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-5f334063d211616584c1d9ad285d60c174c0c975e37a527946d252bdf189333e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18213584$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olejniczak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, T. Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Takeharu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility</title><title>Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer</title><description>Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively.</description><subject>Enthalpy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Nonequilibrium gas dynamics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reactive, radiative, or nonequilibrium flows</subject><issn>0887-8722</issn><issn>1533-6808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtrGzEUhUVoIW4a-hcG0jRkMa6uHjOapbHjPHDoJl2LG41EZMajqSRD_e87zRgCaVd3cT6-czmEfAE6ZxLEd5iDrIU4ITOQnJeVouoDmVGl6lLVjJ2STyltKYVK1TAjq2XYDRh9Cn0RXHHT5xfshkOxstnGne8x-zF5tPkltKlwIRbYF4toygebizUa3_l8-Ew-OuySPT_eM_JzffO0vCs3P27vl4tNiULwXErHuaAVbxlABZVUwkDbYMuUbCtqoBaGmqaWltcoWd2IqmWSPbcOVMM5t_yMfJu8Qwy_9jZlvfPJ2K7D3oZ90qwBylklR_DiHbgN-9iPv2nGAZpGjeUjdTVRJoaUonV6iH6H8aCB6r9batCvW47k5dGHyWDnIvbGpzdcMeCT8evEoUd86_xXd_1fbIr10Drt9l2X7e_M_wBkOYmK</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Park, Chul</creator><creator>Raiche, George A</creator><creator>Driver, David M</creator><creator>Olejniczak, Joseph</creator><creator>Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda</creator><creator>Hightower, T. Mark</creator><creator>Sakai, Takeharu</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility</title><author>Park, Chul ; Raiche, George A ; Driver, David M ; Olejniczak, Joseph ; Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda ; Hightower, T. Mark ; Sakai, Takeharu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-5f334063d211616584c1d9ad285d60c174c0c975e37a527946d252bdf189333e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Enthalpy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Nonequilibrium gas dynamics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reactive, radiative, or nonequilibrium flows</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olejniczak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, T. Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Takeharu</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Chul</au><au>Raiche, George A</au><au>Driver, David M</au><au>Olejniczak, Joseph</au><au>Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda</au><au>Hightower, T. Mark</au><au>Sakai, Takeharu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>672-679</pages><issn>0887-8722</issn><eissn>1533-6808</eissn><coden>JTHTEO</coden><abstract>Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.15744</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-8722 |
| ispartof | Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer, 2006-10, Vol.20 (4), p.672-679 |
| issn | 0887-8722 1533-6808 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2311998584 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Enthalpy Exact sciences and technology Fluid dynamics Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Instrumentation for fluid dynamics Nonequilibrium gas dynamics Physics Reactive, radiative, or nonequilibrium flows |
| title | Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Enthalpy%20Determination%20Methods%20for%20an%20Arc-Jet%20Facility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thermophysics%20and%20heat%20transfer&rft.au=Park,%20Chul&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=672-679&rft.issn=0887-8722&rft.eissn=1533-6808&rft.coden=JTHTEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.15744&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2311998584%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311998584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |