Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility

Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer 2006-10, Vol.20 (4), p.672-679
Hauptverfasser: Park, Chul, Raiche, George A, Driver, David M, Olejniczak, Joseph, Terrazas-Salinas, Imelda, Hightower, T. Mark, Sakai, Takeharu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively.
ISSN:0887-8722
1533-6808
DOI:10.2514/1.15744