Comparison of Enthalpy Determination Methods for an Arc-Jet Facility
Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer 2006-10, Vol.20 (4), p.672-679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-8722 1533-6808 |
DOI: | 10.2514/1.15744 |