Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods

The increasing diversity of learners and their preferences coupled with increasing usage of the computer and Internet prompted the need for testing and verifying the ways that knowledge can be delivered and learned effectively. This research addresses these concerns by comparing the results of a col...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly review of distance education 2005-07, Vol.6 (2), p.87
Hauptverfasser: Chernish, William N, DeFranco, Agnes L, Lindner, James R, Dooley, Kim E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 87
container_title Quarterly review of distance education
container_volume 6
creator Chernish, William N
DeFranco, Agnes L
Lindner, James R
Dooley, Kim E
description The increasing diversity of learners and their preferences coupled with increasing usage of the computer and Internet prompted the need for testing and verifying the ways that knowledge can be delivered and learned effectively. This research addresses these concerns by comparing the results of a college course, hospitality human resource management, which was offered by the same instructor, to the same student pool, in one semester, with the same text and common examinations, but using three different delivery methods: traditional classroom, instructional television, and Internet. Implications for the instructors, instructional designers, and the use of technology are also discussed. (Contains 3 tables.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_231079518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ874990</ericid><sourcerecordid>975609481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e488-10dda9bbcb9b936a33d2e881a2585f06ae2d3cc80746a915486f3d1f993ae2b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMoWKf_wIvgfSEfbZpcyVinm3QIo_clbd7YjtrOJBXqr7cyr87FeTg85wpFjAoVUybENYpoymTMUypv0Z33J0KoJJmI0DEfweN9wAcdArhnvB50P_90wwcOLeAj-KkPHo8Wl60DwHlnLTgYAi5Au-GPy6HvvsHN-AChHY2_RzdW9x4e_nOFypdtudnFxfvrfrMuYkikjCkxRqu6bmpVKy4054aBlFSzVKaWCA3M8KZZLBOhFU0TKSw31CrFl6omfIWeLrNnN35N4EN1Gie32PuKcUoytZxdoMcLBK5rqrPrPrWbq-2bzBKlCP8Fj7xUzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231079518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Chernish, William N ; DeFranco, Agnes L ; Lindner, James R ; Dooley, Kim E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chernish, William N ; DeFranco, Agnes L ; Lindner, James R ; Dooley, Kim E</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing diversity of learners and their preferences coupled with increasing usage of the computer and Internet prompted the need for testing and verifying the ways that knowledge can be delivered and learned effectively. This research addresses these concerns by comparing the results of a college course, hospitality human resource management, which was offered by the same instructor, to the same student pool, in one semester, with the same text and common examinations, but using three different delivery methods: traditional classroom, instructional television, and Internet. Implications for the instructors, instructional designers, and the use of technology are also discussed. (Contains 3 tables.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-1266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlotte: IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult Basic Education ; Adult Students ; College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Conventional Instruction ; Course Content ; Delivery Systems ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Educational Resources ; Educational Television ; Hospitality Occupations ; Human Resources ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Internet ; Learning Theories ; Longitudinal Studies ; Personnel Management ; Student Diversity ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>Quarterly review of distance education, 2005-07, Vol.6 (2), p.87</ispartof><rights>Copyright Information Age Publishing, Inc. Summer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ874990$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chernish, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFranco, Agnes L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kim E</creatorcontrib><title>Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods</title><title>Quarterly review of distance education</title><description>The increasing diversity of learners and their preferences coupled with increasing usage of the computer and Internet prompted the need for testing and verifying the ways that knowledge can be delivered and learned effectively. This research addresses these concerns by comparing the results of a college course, hospitality human resource management, which was offered by the same instructor, to the same student pool, in one semester, with the same text and common examinations, but using three different delivery methods: traditional classroom, instructional television, and Internet. Implications for the instructors, instructional designers, and the use of technology are also discussed. (Contains 3 tables.)</description><subject>Adult Basic Education</subject><subject>Adult Students</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Educational Television</subject><subject>Hospitality Occupations</subject><subject>Human Resources</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Personnel Management</subject><subject>Student Diversity</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1528-3518</issn><issn>2169-1266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMoWKf_wIvgfSEfbZpcyVinm3QIo_clbd7YjtrOJBXqr7cyr87FeTg85wpFjAoVUybENYpoymTMUypv0Z33J0KoJJmI0DEfweN9wAcdArhnvB50P_90wwcOLeAj-KkPHo8Wl60DwHlnLTgYAi5Au-GPy6HvvsHN-AChHY2_RzdW9x4e_nOFypdtudnFxfvrfrMuYkikjCkxRqu6bmpVKy4054aBlFSzVKaWCA3M8KZZLBOhFU0TKSw31CrFl6omfIWeLrNnN35N4EN1Gie32PuKcUoytZxdoMcLBK5rqrPrPrWbq-2bzBKlCP8Fj7xUzA</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Chernish, William N</creator><creator>DeFranco, Agnes L</creator><creator>Lindner, James R</creator><creator>Dooley, Kim E</creator><general>IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc</general><general>Information Age Publishing</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods</title><author>Chernish, William N ; DeFranco, Agnes L ; Lindner, James R ; Dooley, Kim E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e488-10dda9bbcb9b936a33d2e881a2585f06ae2d3cc80746a915486f3d1f993ae2b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult Basic Education</topic><topic>Adult Students</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Educational Television</topic><topic>Hospitality Occupations</topic><topic>Human Resources</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Personnel Management</topic><topic>Student Diversity</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chernish, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFranco, Agnes L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kim E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly review of distance education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chernish, William N</au><au>DeFranco, Agnes L</au><au>Lindner, James R</au><au>Dooley, Kim E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ874990</ericid><atitle>Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly review of distance education</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><pages>87-</pages><issn>1528-3518</issn><eissn>2169-1266</eissn><abstract>The increasing diversity of learners and their preferences coupled with increasing usage of the computer and Internet prompted the need for testing and verifying the ways that knowledge can be delivered and learned effectively. This research addresses these concerns by comparing the results of a college course, hospitality human resource management, which was offered by the same instructor, to the same student pool, in one semester, with the same text and common examinations, but using three different delivery methods: traditional classroom, instructional television, and Internet. Implications for the instructors, instructional designers, and the use of technology are also discussed. (Contains 3 tables.)</abstract><cop>Charlotte</cop><pub>IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-3518
ispartof Quarterly review of distance education, 2005-07, Vol.6 (2), p.87
issn 1528-3518
2169-1266
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_231079518
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Adult Basic Education
Adult Students
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Conventional Instruction
Course Content
Delivery Systems
Distance Education
Distance learning
Educational Resources
Educational Television
Hospitality Occupations
Human Resources
Instructional Design
Instructional Effectiveness
Internet
Learning Theories
Longitudinal Studies
Personnel Management
Student Diversity
Teaching Methods
Technology Uses in Education
title Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A40%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20It%20Matter?%20Analyzing%20the%20Results%20of%20Three%20Different%20Learning%20Delivery%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20review%20of%20distance%20education&rft.au=Chernish,%20William%20N&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.pages=87-&rft.issn=1528-3518&rft.eissn=2169-1266&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E975609481%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231079518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ874990&rfr_iscdi=true