A Data-Based Reply to Witts and Traub (2019)

Phu and Byrne (2018) located and discussed client testimonials that appeared to violate the Behavior Analyst Certification Board's Professional and Ethical Compliance Code. In their critique of our work, Witts and Traub (2019) expressed skepticism regarding the behavior-analytic nature of our d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2019-11, Vol.19 (4), p.393-395
1. Verfasser:	Byrne, Tom
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Autism Spectrum Disorders Behavior Analysis Biased Sampling Human Professional Ethics
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Phu and Byrne (2018) located and discussed client testimonials that appeared to violate the Behavior Analyst Certification Board's Professional and Ethical Compliance Code. In their critique of our work, Witts and Traub (2019) expressed skepticism regarding the behavior-analytic nature of our data set, focused on testimonial use by individuals who are not behavior analysts, and ignored our disclaimers regarding sampling bias. Here I present data showing the preponderance of board-certified behavior analysts holding administrative positions in our sample and reiterate the language we used to define our subject matter.
ISSN:	2372-9414 2372-9414
DOI:	10.1037/bar0000168