Predicting plasticity‐controlled failure of glassy polymers: Influence of stress‐accelerated progressive physical aging

ABSTRACT This study focuses on the prediction of long‐term failure of glassy polymers under static or cyclic loading conditions, including the role of stress‐accelerated progressive aging. Progressive physical aging plays a dominant role in a polymer's performance under prolonged loading conditions, and to obtain accurate predictions of failure, its effect has to be considered. First, the aging kinetics, as influenced by temperature and stress history, are studied extensively. Similar to an elevated temperature, the application of a stress (below the yield stress) activates the aging process, and as a result, the yield stress will evolve faster in time. The activation by stress appears to be limited; at some stress level, the activation stagnates and is followed by rejuvenation. This evolution is captured in a model by introducing a state parameter, which describes the thermodynamic state of the material and is directly linked to the yield stress. With the aging kinetics included in the model, an accurate prediction of the failure time for cyclic loading conditions is obtained. For static loading conditions, however, the effect of physical aging is overestimated because of the stagnation of the activation by stress. It appears that there are marked differences in the stress level where stagnation and subsequent rejuvenation occur for a cyclic or static load. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019, 57, 1300–1314 Progressive physical aging plays a dominant role in a polymer's performance under prolonged loading conditions, and to obtain accurate predictions of failure, its effect has to be considered. Similar to an elevated temperature, the application of a stress (below the yield stress) activates the aging process, and as a result, the yield stress will evolve faster in time. This directly leads to creep failure occurring on a longer time scale. The activation by stress appears to be limited; at some stress levels, the activation stagnates and is followed by rejuvenation. It appears that there are marked differences in the stress level where stagnation and subsequent rejuvenation occur for a cyclic or static load.