Constitutional formalism and the meaning of Apprendi v. New Jersey

In "Apprendi v. New Jersey," the US Supreme Court imposed a procedural limitation on prosecutors by restricting the types of facts that may be proved at sentencing rather than at trial. The Court adopted a constitutional principle that "any fact that increases the penalty for a crime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American criminal law review 2001-03, Vol.38 (2), p.281
1. Verfasser: Priester, Benjamin J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In "Apprendi v. New Jersey," the US Supreme Court imposed a procedural limitation on prosecutors by restricting the types of facts that may be proved at sentencing rather than at trial. The Court adopted a constitutional principle that "any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum" is an element of the offense of the conviction.
ISSN:0164-0364