Constitutional formalism and the meaning of Apprendi v. New Jersey
In "Apprendi v. New Jersey," the US Supreme Court imposed a procedural limitation on prosecutors by restricting the types of facts that may be proved at sentencing rather than at trial. The Court adopted a constitutional principle that "any fact that increases the penalty for a crime...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American criminal law review 2001-03, Vol.38 (2), p.281 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In "Apprendi v. New Jersey," the US Supreme Court imposed a procedural limitation on prosecutors by restricting the types of facts that may be proved at sentencing rather than at trial. The Court adopted a constitutional principle that "any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum" is an element of the offense of the conviction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0164-0364 |