Clinical efficacy and safety of telmisartan 80 mg once daily vs. atenolol 50 mg once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

Summary The objective of this open‐label, parallel‐group comparative study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of once‐daily treatment for 8 weeks with telmisartan 80 mg in comparison with atenolol 50 mg on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2004-12, Vol.58 (s145), p.35-39
Hauptverfasser: Alcocer, L., Fernández-Bonetti, P., Campos, E., Olvera Ruiz, R., Bahena, J., DE La Fuente, J.J., Segovia-Ayala, C., Dominguez-Henkel, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The objective of this open‐label, parallel‐group comparative study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of once‐daily treatment for 8 weeks with telmisartan 80 mg in comparison with atenolol 50 mg on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with mild‐to‐moderate hypertension (morning supine SBP 141–199 mmHg, DBP 95–114 mmHg). A total of 58 patients were enrolled. The comparability of the two treatment groups was statistically documented at the beginning of the study. Telmisartan was more effective than atenolol, with a decrease in SBP of 21.7 mmHg vs. 11.8 mmHg (p = 0.03) and a non‐significant decrease in DBP of 14.7 mmHg vs. 10.1 mmHg. The safety profiles of both drugs were very similar; both drugs were well tolerated. In conclusion, once‐daily telmisartan 80 mg is more effective than once‐daily atenolol 50 mg in lowering SBP with no negative chronotropism. Furthermore, telmisartan was as well tolerated as atenolol in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension in adults.
ISSN:1368-5031
1742-1241
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00408.x