Comparison of the performance of a vapor-injection scroll compressor and a two-stage scroll compressor working with high pressure ratios

•Performance comparison of vapor-injection scroll and two-stage scroll compressors.•Semi-empirical models of compressors are implemented and validated experimentally.•The vapor-injection scroll compressor performs better for pressure ratios below 5.•The two-stage compressors improve the efficiency a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied thermal engineering 2019-09, Vol.160, p.114023, Article 114023
Hauptverfasser: Tello-Oquendo, Fernando M., Navarro-Peris, Emilio, Gonzálvez-Maciá, José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Performance comparison of vapor-injection scroll and two-stage scroll compressors.•Semi-empirical models of compressors are implemented and validated experimentally.•The vapor-injection scroll compressor performs better for pressure ratios below 5.•The two-stage compressors improve the efficiency and COP for high pressure ratios.•The intermediate pressure for a water heating application was optimized. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of a vapor-injection scroll compressor (SCVI) and a two-stage scroll compressor (TSSC) working with high pressure ratios in heat pump applications. Semi-empirical models of the compressors are implemented. The models are adjusted with experimental data obtained in a calorimetric test bench. The optimum displacement ratio (DR) is analyzed considering two criteria, COP maximization, and discharge temperature minimization. Once defined the optimum DR, a systematic comparison of the compressors is performed in terms of compressor efficiencies, heating capacity, COP, and discharge temperature. Finally, the intermediate pressure is optimized for a high-temperature water heating application, taking into account heat sink of finite capacity. Results show that the optimum DR of TSSC is around 0.58 and the COP is 6% larger than that the SCVI at the nominal point. Considering a wide range of operating conditions, the SCVI presents better efficiency and COP for pressure ratios below 5. For higher-pressure ratios, the TSSC presents better performance and achieves lower discharge temperature. The heating capacity of the TSSC can be improved by 7% by varying the swept volume of the high-stage compressor compared with the SCVI, with a minimum effect on the COP and on the discharge temperature from the optimum conditions.
ISSN:1359-4311
1873-5606
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114023